[Karma101]

Originally Posted by Hawksea

It's actually 2.8.

Compared to 3.1 in 2011, 3.3 in 2010 and 3.4 on 2009.

Looks like you guys fell flat on your faces again just like your patron saint.

Damn the ratings have gone downhill since Rock returned, I knew he was pretty irrelevant nowadays but I didn't think it would be quite this bad.

[Skeff]

Just read the last three pages of this thread. It was mind numbing. Grow the fuck up.

[Hawksea]

Originally Posted by Karma101

Damn the ratings have gone downhill since Rock returned, I knew he was pretty irrelevant nowadays but I didn't think it would be quite this bad.

The highest points in 2011 and 2012 is actually when he was one.

Two 3.8 Raws in the lead up to WM 27 that featured him in the last segments for 2011.

And 3.8 rated Raw 1000 for 2012 that had him on 2 segments.

[Karma101]

Originally Posted by Hawksea

The highest points in 2011 and 2012 is actually when he was one.

Two 3.8 Raws in the lead up to WM 27 that featured him in the last segments for 2011.

And 3.8 rated Raw 1000 for 2012 that had him on 2 segments.

I bet Punk was on those shows too.

[Biast]

Originally Posted by Hawksea

It's actually 2.8.

Compared to 3.1 in 2011, 3.3 in 2010 and 3.4 on 2009.

Looks like you guys fell flat on your faces again just like your patron saint.

No it's not. From where did you get those? I got the numbers from bleacherreport. I think you're inventing stuff.

Either way, you didn't answer my question, are you a wrestling fan or a ratings fan? I could understand you caring about the ratings if you actually worked in the finance department of WWE and were getting paid a % of the people viewing the show. People these days...

I can understand you thought, Punk is too good on the mic and in the ring so you guys only have ''ratings'' againts him, which is a thing that should be unimportant to wrestling fans/viewers. Accept it, you can't touch Punk.

[Kelly Kelly fan]

Originally Posted by Biast

Them roids busting out from every part of his body.

Dwayne doesnt do steroids

[Hawksea]

Originally Posted by Biast

No it's not. From where did you get those? I got the numbers from bleacherreport. I think you're inventing stuff.

Either way, you didn't answer my question, are you a wrestling fan or a ratings fan? I could understand you caring about the ratings if you actually worked in the finance department of WWE and were getting paid a % of the people viewing the show. People these days...

I can understand you thought, Punk is too good on the mic and in the ring so you guys only have ''ratings'' againts him, which is a thing that should be unimportant to wrestling fans/viewers. Accept it, you can't touch Punk.

A guy who can't even cut a promo from a kayfabe POV and got carried by Cena in the greatest match of his life is "too good" on the mic and in the ring?

I could easily name 15 more talented in-ring performers than this walking botchfest highlight reel.

[Mysteriobiceps]

Originally Posted by Hawksea

A guy who can't even cut a promo from a none kayfabe POV and got carried by Cena in the greatest match of his life is "too good" on the mic and in the ring?

I could easily name 15 more talented in-ring performers than this walking botchfest highlight reel.

one of the stupidest post I have ever seen. Punk can`t cut a NON kayfabe promo? How about dat shoot promo

[Karma101]

Originally Posted by Hawksea

I could easily name 15 more talented in-ring performers than this walking botchfest highlight reel.

Please be my guest.

[VINT]

The feud had a very good build-up until right now and I have to say it holds a place between my top feuds of all time.

On Mania, I'm really hoping that it would be a triple threat match but I don't see it happening. Dammit.