Originally Posted by AthenaMark
How? Only Cena got close to 400 days? Who gives a fuck. Was that really good? Did you enjoy that? It made 2007 unbearable. It was horrible. They ONCE AGAIN had to run to another top name to bail them out and that was Donald Trump, who was getting big ratings on television, and Stone Cold to hype up that year's Mania since nobody gave TWO FUCKS about Shawn Michaels vs Cena. Once again...Cena wasn't treated like the biggest thing at the show. Hell, the fans were more amped up for Taker vs Batista. And BTW...Taker's streak is bigger than a 400 day reign to the fans. That's what pisses the fans off when it's rumored to be broken. It never fails. It gets instant heat just like Vickie Guerrero. If they had any balls, it would be Taker vs Brock or Taker vs Cena with Rock vs Brock in the top spot. That would make this an AUTOMATIC nominee for one of the best Manias in awhile instead of settling. What's gonna happen to Punk? Make it a Triple Threat or put him against Taker and nobody buying it at all? LMAO.
I did not enjoy it. I got tired of Cena during 2007 myself. But Punk's reign has been better than Cena's has. He has cut great promos, put on terrific matches, his character his evolved. He has managed to stay interesting.
That's up for debate for what is bigger between Undertaker's streak and a 400 day reign. Both of them are pretty big, if you ask me. For a great deal of fans, it's the first 400 day reign they are seeing in their life.
I don't know about nobody buying CM Punk facing the Undertaker at Wrestlemania or him main eventing Wrestlemania. I think it will do a good buy rate with him in one of the big matches. I don't think Punk being in a main event match is going to convince people not to buy the show.
The Rock has put over CM Punk in a huge way. Now has been the perfect time for him to truly come into form.
Again, not just anybody gets a 400 day title reign, much less in this era where titles change so often.