[AthenaMark]

Originally Posted by Tony Tornado

All those matches need longer buildups and all three of them deserve to headline a Wrestlemania. It would be too much for a single PPV, even a Wrestlemania.

WTF....HAHAHAHA. You people think Cena and Punk are MUCH, MUCH bigger than they actually are. If they meant that much, there would be no need for a Rock or Austin to ever come back in the first place. You wouldn't have people BEGGING FOR IT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sfT0glK-ms

[Stone Hot]

Originally Posted by Tony Tornado

All those matches need longer buildups and all three of them deserve to headline a Wrestlemania. It would be too much for a single PPV, even a Wrestlemania.

They dont need longer build ups. Hogan vs Rock was build up in 4 weeks. between Chamber and WM is 7 weeks and plus the weeks starting now they have loads of time to build all those matches

[Stone Hot]

Originally Posted by paulborklaserheyma

Rock/Lesnar and Taker/Cena are possible but Punk/Austin aint happening.

you never know!! never say never

[Shazayum]

Originally Posted by Stone Hot

http://www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/...he-undertaker/

remember when they report right after WM last year that the big matches at WM 29 would be Austin vs Punk, Brock vs Rock, Taker vs Cena? Do you think it may actually happen? with Rock saying this will be the biggest WM of all time

That's never happening and shouldn't happen, from a business standpoint. You can't blow 3 big money-making matches all on the same PPV just to break some sort of record, it doesn't make sense. You need to have Austin/Punk headline one, Taker/Cena headline another, and Brock/Rock headline a separate wrestlemania, in order to have a special, main attraction for each event.

[Stone Hot]

Originally Posted by Shazayum

That's never happening and shouldn't happen, from a business standpoint. You can't blow 3 big money-making matches all on the same PPV just to break some sort of record, it doesn't make sense. You need to have Austin/Punk headline one, Taker/Cena headline another, and Brock/Rock headline a separate wrestlemania, in order to have a special, main attraction for each event.

Well your not gonna get them to headline there own it just wont happen some of them will be on the card together. If I was booking it i would have Austin vs Punk, Cena vs Rock 2, and Brock vs Taker at 29 and have Cena vs Taker and Brock vs Rock at 30

[Shazayum]

Originally Posted by Stone Hot

Well your not gonna get them to headline there own it just wont happen some of them will be on the card together. If I was booking it i would have Austin vs Punk, Cena vs Rock 2, and Brock vs Taker at 29 and have Cena vs Taker and Brock vs Rock at 30

Uh, why wouldn't it happen? Are there some unavoidable circumstances that I am not picking up on?

[Stone Hot]

Austin, Taker are not getting younger and who knows if Brock Lesnar or Rock will be here past WM 30 or 29 for that matter thats why I think they should have them do the matches while they can

How would you book those 3 matches?

[Shazayum]

Originally Posted by Stone Hot

Austin, Taker are not getting younger and who knows if Brock Lesnar or Rock will be here past WM 30 or 29 for that matter thats why I think they should have them do the matches while they can

How would you book those 3 matches?

Rock/Lesnar at this year's mania, Taker/Cena next year, and Austin/Punk the following year.

[Stone Hot]

Originally Posted by Shazayum

Rock/Lesnar at this year's mania, Taker/Cena next year, and Austin/Punk the following year.

Austin is not getting younger hes already 48 if u have Punk vs Austin at WM 31 he will be 50 years old

[Shazayum]

Originally Posted by Stone Hot

Austin is not getting younger hes already 48 if u have Punk vs Austin at WM 31 he will be 50 years old

So what? It's not like at 48 he'll be considerably more healthy than he is at 50. If he thinks he can work a match at 50 he can work a match at 50, no problem.