Originally Posted by TheF1BOB
How do you define star my friend?
I take it back, Punk shouldn't be in video games, he shouldn't be in the company full stop.
Even though he hasn't had the opponents others had back in the day, his reign has been forgettable.
Agree about his match with Rock being the peak of his reign though.
Ratings don't matter at this point. They're not even competing with anyone for ratings to matter anymore. Besides the entire product should be blamed for ratings, not Punk. Not when he's barely wrestling. lol
Also being stuck with shit opponents have a lot to do with a forgettable reign. Stop putting it all on Punk when he's had chicken shit to work with like that awful Ric Flair segment. They keep sticking Punk in horrible stuff so of course his reign will be horrible.
Originally Posted by The-Rock-Says
No. Rock should take the title at RR and defend it at EC and at Mania. Punks reign has peaked and it's time for a fresh change.
Yeah, going back to a guy who was main eventing 10 years ago is a fresh change!
Originally Posted by Choke2Death
No, Punk is the biggest flop in recent memory as a top guy. He doesn't deserve it. Plus his stale & terrible title run needs to come to an end. If they let him go with it all the way through Wrestlemania 29, WWE will be forced out of business with 0.4 ratings. Or alternatively, WWE employees buy a bunch of TV sets, put the show on just to make their numbers look good.
How is he a flop? lol I've yet to see him do anything that warrants his reign was a flop. All the negatives come from WWE as usual, crappy storylines, shitty opponents for Punk, not having him Main Event for half of his reign, shit product so ratings are low.
None of this is Punk's fault at all. Tensai is a big flop, had a new gimmick, beat Cena, Punk and everything yet failed to garner interest. That's a big flop. Not Punk.