[Cookie Monster]

Originally Posted by Choke2Death

That's fucking terrible. The Anaconda Vice can't hurt a baby, yet we're supposed to believe it can make The Rock pass out? LOL.

And before somebody tells me about how it's a MMA move, so what? It can be countered by simply a knee to the back or even turned into a roll-up.

This isn't actually true. I once injured a baby doing the Anaconda Vice.

[Th3Gr3atOn3]

^ I got it.................................................

[Sho'nuff]

Originally Posted by Th3Gr3atOn3

have the rock lose because of lesnar interfering, then have the rock enter the rumble at number 30 and win it. have him win at wm29, then drop the belt at survivor serious so that the GOAT can finally get a decent long reign, have him win the WHC sometime between then and become undisputed champ.

So basically, you want a part time wrestler, who would be lucky to have time to work a dozen dates between April & November to win both titles?

That is pretty much shitting on the entire roster. Rock doesn't need both belts, for that long anyway. If he can't be there at least twice a month, no sense in him holding the belt for 7 months. If anything, have him win it at WM and drop it by June. Otherwise, you have your roster feuding for no reason, as nobody can get a title shot for 7 months. And unlike Rock, some people need a title reign/title feud for them to stand out. Rock already stands out and is superior to the roster by just showing up.

Besides, as nice as Rock seems and the love he has for the business, I doubt he would want to win the belt and hold it for 7 months, as it could be detrimental to developing other stars and possibly affect house show business.

[Th3Gr3atOn3]

Originally Posted by El Chapo

So basically, you want a part time wrestler, who would be lucky to have time to work a dozen dates between April & November to win both titles?

That is pretty much shitting on the entire roster. Rock doesn't need both belts, for that long anyway. If he can't be there at least twice a month, no sense in him holding the belt for 7 months. If anything, have him win it at WM and drop it by June. Otherwise, you have your roster feuding for no reason, as nobody can get a title shot for 7 months. And unlike Rock, some people need a title reign/title feud for them to stand out. Rock already stands out and is superior to the roster by just showing up.

Besides, as nice as Rock seems and the love he has for the business, I doubt he would want to win the belt and hold it for 7 months, as it could be detrimental to developing other stars and possibly affect house show business.

He can only do that if he shows up every raw and smack down, only then will my fantasy booking be alright for the rock, if he shows up 2 times a month, then will he should not hold the belts for 2 months let alone 7.
Edit: even you have to admit it would be epic for the rock to hold the titles for that long if he comes back for 1 year and work full time.

[Sho'nuff]

Oh yeah, if he could come back full time, perfect way to unify the titles and also, when the year runs out, a good way of having a truly deserving guy go over Rock.

It would be nice if he could come back full time or at least on a Brock schedule. I wasn't sold in the past but now I'm convinced that he could single handed turn the company around.

[Th3Gr3atOn3]

This might sound crazy, but if the rock comes back for say 2 full years.royal rumble 2013-wm32. He is given the belts at wm29, he gets to hold em for a good 7+months, have a truly deserving guy go over him. Have him win the belts some more, have him main event and be in all the public appeareces and he can promote his movies while wearing both titles. have him be the focal point of every raw, smack down, house show, paper view, let wwe be tv-14, bring back 1999-2000 style rock, and bamn, the fifth boom period starts.

[Sho'nuff]

I don't know about all that. I don't think Rock can maintain a boom period by himself. Remember, it took a strong supporting cast to make the Attitude Era and the reason it even worked in the first place was because it made new stars.

I wouldn't mind to see Punk/Attitude Era. Would be a good way to put Punk over as a competitor and also make for good TV, by having him feud with Rock, Foley and eventually, Undertaker and Austin. Maybe even have more guys added to Punk's stable (possible NXT invasion) and start a feud with the entire WWE, in which the Attitude Era guys come to save the day.

[Th3Gr3atOn3]

that is true but what am saying is that if the rock single handedly manages to take the raw ratings from 2-3s to 4-5s, then he started another boom, ofc it would take a miracle for him to pull 6-7s like he was doing in 2000 but who knows. I also think if he does that then he will undoubtedly become GOAT in every bodies eyes. BTW who do u think is the GOAT.

[Cookie Monster]

No one, not even The Rock could start another boom. Society and the world in general decides the boom period, not a superstar.

[Th3Gr3atOn3]

hulk hogans wants to have TWO chats with you.