There's no way Punk, having been Champion for so long, wouldn't get a rematch (kayfabe). It'd make zero sense.
They've done that in the past. When Cena vacated the title in 2007, he didn't automatically get a rematch (although he won the Royal Rumble). When Brock Lesnar lost the title to Eddie Guerrero in 2004, he never got the automatic rematch even though he was champion for about 6 months. As I said, Punk will most likely get his rematch after Wrestlemania when Cena (or whoever else) is champion.
Considering the amount of things that don't make sense in the WWE today, this is probably one of the more "understandable" ones compared to the shit they come up with weekly.
Wrestling and logic don't mix, the sooner you accept it, the better.
Way to deal with lack of rematch between Punk and Rock:
GM: Sorry Punk, when you had your match against Del Rio last year, Lauranitus removed your rematch clause cause he didn't like you. Sucks, soooo, do you want the WHC instead, we're not doing anything cool with it.
Ding, Ding. Here's your winner lol. Ryback isn't getting anywhere near Taker. Why anybody would even entertain this notion is beyond me. It simply and 150 million % isn't happening. Never. Heyman is talking about HHH to get heat and lately, to piss off Vince. That's it. It's hardly cause to believe a rematch is on the cards. From what I remember, Floyd didn't confirm anything. If they do Taker/Cena for 29, by the time 30 rolls along and Brock is gone, Rock is possibly gone, they're going to be fucked. It's the only BIG match they have left involving guys who aren't going anywhere else. I think they'd rather coast with 29 than sacrifice for 30.
This is the same thing I say all the time. WWE would be nuts to have Cena/Taker prematurely. That much is just too damn big. I have been anticipating it since 2009. The Volcano erupts at Wrestlemania XXX. That's how big I think that match is. What happens in that match and whatever ends up being the end result is going to dictate the future of the WWE (especially the future of John Cena). I know you and others are going to laugh at me for saying this: There is no other reason for WWE bringing back The Rock and Brock Lesnar other than to hold off on their WM 30 main event. They are already thinking about that show. Cena and Taker's storylines for Mania's 27-29 are pure fucking filler to me. Plus this match will draw based on the two names involved, it's WM, and Vince is going to promote his ass off for the 30th installment.
i think the best case scenario is Brock costs Rock the WWE Championship, it would make sense with Punk's alliance with Heyman and also would set up Brock vs Rock. Punk could go ahead and at Wrestlemania face....Triple-H or Undertaker or even Steve Austin.
__________________ Not Removing Until:
John Cena faces Undertaker at Wrestlemania [ ]
Sheamus and Cm Punk are the 2 World Champions [X] -Wrestlemania 28
John Morrison wins World Title [ ]
John Cena losses cleanly [X]- Wrestlemania 28 Rock Beats John Cena
If Rock/Cena II has to happen, then instead of Cena winning rumble 2013 and facing the Rock at mania, they should have the Rock win the Rumble and go for the championship against Cena. That would be much more interesting IMO.
keep Ryback away from Rock, Taker, Lesnar, and Cena
he has no business messing with that type of starpower
besides, if Taker/Ryback happen I could just see Ryback not being able to pick Taker up
__________________
"Every single thing you're doing right now in the wwe john , going to every show , The Rock has already done it . Every single thing you're thinking about doing , outside of the wwe , The Rock has already done it , as a matter of fact The Rock has done it better !"
i've been thinking about this...Rock winning the WWE Championship. He HAS to be there every week till Wrestlemania, or most weeks anyway, i mean Raw without the WWE Champion or with the WWE Champion on satellite? just no. For Rock, thats really hard looking at his movie schedule. To me it makes me think Rock actually won't win at Royal Rumble.
What sense does it make anyway. They could use it to get Punk more over and hated than over by having him somehow beat Rock. Rock winning is stupid cause him ending a reign that has lasted for over a whole year is just sad, they can use it to put over new stars, someone like Rock ending it also doesn't make sense cause he makes only a few appearances in a year, the guy who makes a few appearances in a year ending the year-long title reign? Kinda stupid.
Put over new stars? They've had 7 fucking years to create new stars via Cena/Taker/DX. Did they? HELL FUCKING NO. Shelton Benjamin should of been WWE champion.Point blank. They fucked him over and made him a jobber after he was unbeatable for almost 8 fucking months. That's why you don't see any "new stars" and that's not the Rock's job. He's above all of that. He's an attraction. When is CM Punk gonna lay down for Bryan in the middle of the ring? When is Cena gonna lose to anyone that isn't CM Punk? Does anyone have that fucking answer? HHH has to get "REVENGE" against Lesnar because he tapped out? WTF. LMAO. And you're worried about the Rock, who's job is simply to sell and make WM bigger, than it could possibly be if he wasn't there? Get real.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rock Raw Christmas 2000
All the other jabroni reindeer used to be so jealous and look at him in vain because they couldn't STAND THE FACT that the People would be chanting ROCKY's name
Put over new stars? They've had 7 fucking years to create new stars via Cena/Taker/DX. Did they? HELL FUCKING NO. Shelton Benjamin should of been WWE champion.Point blank. They fucked him over and made him a jobber after he was unbeatable for almost 8 fucking months. That's why you don't see any "new stars" and that's not the Rock's job. He's above all of that. He's an attraction. When is CM Punk gonna lay down for Bryan in the middle of the ring? When is Cena gonna lose to anyone that isn't CM Punk? Does anyone have that fucking answer? HHH has to get "REVENGE" against Lesnar because he tapped out? WTF. LMAO. And you're worried about the Rock, who's job is simply to sell and make WM bigger, than it could possibly be if he wasn't there? Get real.
calm down, i wasn't even talking about Rock putting over anyone. I said it makes zero sense for Rock, the guy who wrestles once or twice a year, to end a year-long title reign like the one Punk has right now. It would be pointless, they could put over someone by the fact alone that they ended this long title reign of Punk's. Like John Cena became a star after ending JBL's near-year long title reign.
__________________ Not Removing Until:
John Cena faces Undertaker at Wrestlemania [ ]
Sheamus and Cm Punk are the 2 World Champions [X] -Wrestlemania 28
John Morrison wins World Title [ ]
John Cena losses cleanly [X]- Wrestlemania 28 Rock Beats John Cena
This is the same thing I say all the time. WWE would be nuts to have Cena/Taker prematurely. That much is just too damn big. I have been anticipating it since 2009. The Volcano erupts at Wrestlemania XXX. That's how big I think that match is. What happens in that match and whatever ends up being the end result is going to dictate the future of the WWE (especially the future of John Cena). I know you and others are going to laugh at me for saying this: There is no other reason for WWE bringing back The Rock and Brock Lesnar other than to hold off on their WM 30 main event. They are already thinking about that show. Cena and Taker's storylines for Mania's 27-29 are pure fucking filler to me. Plus this match will draw based on the two names involved, it's WM, and Vince is going to promote his ass off for the 30th installment.
Cena/Taker at WM 29? Are you kidding me?
There's plenty of matches to build Wrestlemania 30 around besides Cena Taker.
Austin v Punk is the obvious one. Rock and Lesnar could both be around too. Reports have stated that WWE wants Lesnar back for next year as well, and you know they won't pass on Rock.
I don't dispute that Cena v Taker is a huge match and worthy of Main Eventing WM 30 but it's appeal is nothing more than Cena's possible heel turn. Without a heel turn Cena v Taker is no different than Rock v Cena. It's just a match were everyone will be rooting for Cena to lose.
Last edited by GillbergReturns : 10-28-2012 at 11:24 AM.
Official The Rock vs. CM Punk Discussion Thread
Re: Official The Rock WWE Championship Discussion
