[BrosOfDestruction]

Part 2 of Situation vs what would happen if Vanilla ice banged a teletubby



Michael Hayes, refer to my sig please.

[AngryPhil]

First not a reliable site

Second WWE doesn't even know what they are doing, they have an idea but nothing is set in stone

[Queen Akasha]

I don't see why they just can't do Rock vs Brock or even Rock vs Taker this year. Why waste Rock for another Cena match? The fans already got the result that they wanted this year and I'm willing to bet that Cena will be booed when he wins or the crowd will respond in a very apathetic way.

[x78]

Originally Posted by KingSlayer85

I would have CM Punk vs The Rock at the Rumble only for CM Punk to win and retain and The Rock wins the belt on Raw the next night or at the following PPV before Wrestlemania.

Yeah, Punk going over Rock at RR would be massive even if it was a dusty finish to allow for the rematch.

[bacardimayne]

I'd rather see Punk/Austin or Punk/Taker at Mania, but I really don't want to see Cena beat Rock.

[gohel50]

Michael Hayes' ideas always suck anyway.

[Coffey]

There's been some speculation for quite some time about Cena/Rock II, Austin/Punk & Taker/Brock but there's no way they put those all on the same card, if for no other reason than because they can sell three different shows with each match. But what order could you possibly put them in anyway?? It would be insane.

[Gamblor]

So they're going to go with Rock/Cena II but they might not go with Rock/Cena II?

K.

[TripleG]

I'd rather see Punk/Rock at Mania just because that is the fresh match, but I am not going to hold my breath waiting for it.

[chronoxiong]

I would be pissed if they do Rock/Cena again at next year's Wrestlemania. It will be "once in a lifetime" my ass. Talk about trying to get us to waste our money. I hope Rock and Cena will have their own opponents at the show instead. Hell, I would be happy to see Punk/Rock or even better, Punk/Austin.