Criticism of The Streak
The Undertaker's Streak has its fair share of legitimate credit. It's one of the greatest features of WM each year. But there are some points about it that make it wrong, unfair, bad for business. Here are the points:
The result of The Undertaker's match at WM is always predictable because we know they won't end the streak. Although the match is great to watch, it would be greater if the result was unpredictable.
I think no pro wrestler should be made to look immortal, it makes things too unrealistic. With WM being the only event that Undertaker participates in now, it makes him invincible, unbeatable.
He won't be putting anyone over if The Streak is to be kept alive. Even if he wrestles at another event and puts someone over there, it won't be as big as putting over at WM because the biggest stars should rise at the biggest stage.
Lastly, it is simply unfair that great wrestlers like Triple H, Shawn Michaels(who's even greater than taker) have to lose to him on numerous occasions. Under normal circumstances, if Taker and HBK wrestled 2 big matches, both would get to win one. But Shawn lost both of the big matches because of the WWE's obsession with The Streak. He made them the greatest matches ever, he deserved to win.
__________________
WWE title and World heavyweight title need to be unified because the world title has become inferior due to Smack Down being the inferior show. One of the immediate harms of this inferiority of the world title will be that it won't be that big a deal when Ziggler wins it and he won't go over as gloriously as he would have with the WWE title.
|
Official Undertaker WM Streak Thread - No Other Threads
What a silly suggestion. Miz should not be anywhere near the Streak. He is not a legitimate threat whatsoever. There are only three people who I perceive to be legitimate threats to the Streak, and who I would like to challenge for it: Brock Lesnar, John Cena and the Rock.
