Official Undertaker WM Streak Thread - No Other Threads - Page 64 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 09-28-2012, 12:56 PM   #631 (permalink)
PĪRƚЄ ĦҚЄR
 
Calamity Glitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: California
Posts: 6,423
Calamity Glitch has posts worth readingCalamity Glitch has posts worth readingCalamity Glitch has posts worth readingCalamity Glitch has posts worth readingCalamity Glitch has posts worth readingCalamity Glitch has posts worth readingCalamity Glitch has posts worth readingCalamity Glitch has posts worth readingCalamity Glitch has posts worth readingCalamity Glitch has posts worth readingCalamity Glitch has posts worth reading
Default Re: What if Undertaker had lost...

It definitely would have made Orton a bigger name no matter what would come of it. I didn't know about any of this, though. I wish I hadn't taken such a long break away from watching WWE.
Calamity Glitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 09-29-2012, 08:26 AM   #632 (permalink)
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
 
JAROTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,811
JAROTO needs to make some friendsJAROTO needs to make some friendsJAROTO needs to make some friendsJAROTO needs to make some friendsJAROTO needs to make some friendsJAROTO needs to make some friendsJAROTO needs to make some friendsJAROTO needs to make some friendsJAROTO needs to make some friendsJAROTO needs to make some friendsJAROTO needs to make some friends
Default Re: Official Undertaker WM Streak Thread - No Other Threads

Taker should never lose at WM.
JAROTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2012, 08:31 AM   #633 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: American Gardens Building on W. 81st Street on the 11th floor
Posts: 1,231
blur needs to make some friendsblur needs to make some friendsblur needs to make some friendsblur needs to make some friendsblur needs to make some friendsblur needs to make some friendsblur needs to make some friendsblur needs to make some friendsblur needs to make some friendsblur needs to make some friends
Default Re: Official Undertaker WM Streak Thread - No Other Threads

Taker should really retire this year, undefeated.

Also I would hate to see Cena/Taker. This match is literally impossible to watch. Sorry.
blur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2012, 08:42 AM   #634 (permalink)
THE ONE.
 
YoungGun_UK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 5,327
YoungGun_UK better hope they're relatively new hereYoungGun_UK better hope they're relatively new hereYoungGun_UK better hope they're relatively new hereYoungGun_UK better hope they're relatively new hereYoungGun_UK better hope they're relatively new hereYoungGun_UK better hope they're relatively new hereYoungGun_UK better hope they're relatively new hereYoungGun_UK better hope they're relatively new hereYoungGun_UK better hope they're relatively new hereYoungGun_UK better hope they're relatively new hereYoungGun_UK better hope they're relatively new here
Default Re: Official Undertaker WM Streak Thread - No Other Threads

The Undertaker vs John Cena - Buried Alive Match

That's how it will end I imagine.
__________________
YoungGun_UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 12:37 AM   #635 (permalink)
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Pink Princess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Leeds, Uk
Posts: 371
Pink Princess should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsPink Princess should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsPink Princess should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsPink Princess should be embarassed if they have more than 50 posts
Default Ryback ending Undertakers streak??

If the rumours are true about WWE making a top new guy this Batista/RVD/Goldbeurge Heffer (No Offence)may end Undertakers streak.
The death of his streak marks the end of an era and the begging of a new. Ryback may be the one to end it
Thoughts?
Pink Princess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 12:40 AM   #636 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: dallas tx
Posts: 283
I AM CORN is in rep purgatory
Default Re: Ryback ending Undertakers streak??

it should be john cena or wade barrett.
I AM CORN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 12:50 AM   #637 (permalink)
!!!
 
Headliner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 44,101
Headliner whored out on repHeadliner whored out on repHeadliner whored out on repHeadliner whored out on repHeadliner whored out on repHeadliner whored out on repHeadliner whored out on repHeadliner whored out on repHeadliner whored out on repHeadliner whored out on repHeadliner whored out on rep
Default Re: Official Undertaker WM Streak Thread - No Other Threads

C'mon now. Get real.
__________________

Headliner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 01:13 AM   #638 (permalink)
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
The Pied Piper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,116
The Pied Piper needs to take rep more seriousThe Pied Piper needs to take rep more seriousThe Pied Piper needs to take rep more seriousThe Pied Piper needs to take rep more seriousThe Pied Piper needs to take rep more seriousThe Pied Piper needs to take rep more seriousThe Pied Piper needs to take rep more seriousThe Pied Piper needs to take rep more serious
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomasThunder619 View Post
Actually, the plan was for Undertaker to lose his streak to Kurt Angle. Out of respect to the Deadman, Angle refused to defeat him and quit WWE shortly after.
Um, no, it was Taker who pitched the idea of Angle ending The Streak at WM 22 to Vince when the original plan was to do Taker vs Angle at WM 22.

But instead of calmly told Taker he couldn't accept that, Vince overreacted by erasing every Taker/Angle plan at WM 22 and booked 'em in No Way Out 2006 instead.

Quote:
Originally Posted by murder View Post
Don't know how HHH ended up on my list, sorry. Anyway, a streak that doesn't involve Hogan, Andre, Austin, Rock, Goldberg and Sting doesn't mean anything as far as I'm concerned.
To be fair, I think it's unfair to say that. Sting never even wrestled in WWE & the best time for it happen was at WM 27, in which we saw Sting preferred to face a drug addict.

As for the rest of those names, with Savage, Perfect, Hart, and Foley included, I think it was the matter of Vince being a horny idiot. Yes, I know Vince is a very successful businessman, but he's not the genius many people made him out to be. I think the main reason why Taker never faced the likes of Hogan, Bret, Savage, Perfect, Foley, Angle, Eddie, and Jericho at Wrestlemania was because until Wrestlemania 22, 5 of The Undertaker's Wrestlemania matches are reserved to push talentless lower mid-card big men. Of course, I'm referring to Wrestlemania 9, 11, 15, 19, and 22.

At Wrestlemania 9, instead of booking Taker against Hogan or Savage or Perfect, Vince put him against Giant Gonzales to put Gonzales over.

At Wrestlemania 11, instead of booking Taker against Bret or even Bigelow, we got Bundy.

At Wrestlemania 15, instead of giving us the pinnacle of Taker vs Mankind in a match to end their feud, Vince decided to give Boss Man a push.

At Wrestlemania 19, instead of giving us Taker vs Eddie, Vince opted to push Jones & A-Train.

At Wrestlemania 22, Vince scrapped the idea of Taker vs Angle after Taker pitched the idea of Angle ending The Streak. But Vince overreacted instead of simply saying, "No, Mark, you'll still win the match".

Any match with Goldberg, Lesnar, Rock, and Jericho could have happened at WM 20. But we got that sucky rematch instead.

And Taker/Andre should have been booked at WM 7 (no offense to Snuka), imagine that, Taker's first WM & Andre's last WM, I guess it was the matter of Vince not seeing that legendary opportunity (despite the fact it's been saying hello right under his nose).

And Taker/Austin could have happened at WM 16 if weren't for the injuries they suffered.

Quote:
Originally Posted by murder View Post
I get why WWE makes such a big deal out of it. But I don't get why it's such a big deal for fans.
Perhaps because it's a "one & only" accomplishment. In a sense, no one has ever done it before and perhaps no one ever will. That's why so many fans are attracted to it and ended up feeling an attachment to The Streak. Add to the fact The Undertaker's otherworldly status and everything is perfect to make one huge gimmick accomplishment. And the fact that it lasted for 2 decades amazed so many people as well.

And to be fair, out of the 17 names on The Streak, only 4 of them now are nobodies (Gonzales, A-Train, Bundy, and Boss Man).

The other 13 are either legends (Snuka, Roberts, Nash, HBK, HHH, Flair, and Kane) or very successful top superstars with multi-time world championships (Show, Henry, Sid, Batista, Edge, and Orton), so at least The Streak could brag about beating out big names 80% of the time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomasThunder619 View Post
Actually, the plan was for Undertaker to lose his streak to Kurt Angle. Out of respect to the Deadman, Angle refused to defeat him and quit WWE shortly after.
Um, no, it was Taker who pitched the idea of Angle ending The Streak at WM 22 to Vince when the original plan was to do Taker vs Angle at WM 22.

But instead of calmly told Taker he couldn't accept that, Vince overreacted by erasing every Taker/Angle plan at WM 22 and booked 'em in No Way Out 2006 instead.
The Pied Piper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 11:47 AM   #639 (permalink)
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 438
screw you mcmahon screw you mcmahon
Default In your eyes should WWE book someone like the Miz or Barrett against Taker at WM 29?

I mean the way it's shaping up it doesn't appear that it will be Lesnar vs. Undertaker or Cena vs. Undertaker. So I ask you do you really think someone like Miz or Wade Barrett's career can be propelled by facing the Undertaker?
screw you mcmahon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 11:50 AM   #640 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
TheStudOfEngland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Jolly Ol' England
Posts: 858
TheStudOfEngland needs to take rep more seriousTheStudOfEngland needs to take rep more seriousTheStudOfEngland needs to take rep more seriousTheStudOfEngland needs to take rep more seriousTheStudOfEngland needs to take rep more seriousTheStudOfEngland needs to take rep more serious
Default Re: In your eyes should WWE book someone like the Miz or Barrett against Taker at WM

Nah. I think 'Taker facing someone like Miz or Barrett would be boring! Cena or Lesnar would be a hell of a RTWM, and a hell of a match! Plus, imagine going from facing HBK twice, then HHH twice including hell in a cell, then going on to face someone like Miz...
__________________


#The2ndComing
TheStudOfEngland is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios