 |
|
07-06-2012, 09:48 AM
|
#351 (permalink)
|
|
Convinced Vince to make me a Main-Eventer
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,452
|
Re: Who should beat the Undertaker in WM?
Nobody, period.
__________________

Credit goes to The Fourth Wall
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
07-06-2012, 09:52 AM
|
#352 (permalink)
|
|
THE BEAST.
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,898
|
Re: Who should beat the Undertaker in WM?
No one, its just too big of an accolade to take away from Undertaker (who deserves it and makes him standout amongst all the other Legends) and your never going to be sure if your giving something that big to the right person, I mean unless you can transfer Stone Cold from 1998 or Hulk Hogan from 1987 theirs no one worthy and likely to take that win and propel themselves to super stardom.
Realistically someone who their really 'high' on (Cena?) could use the final match against Taker with having credit for retiring him, that way the streak lives on but they can play on the fact this person retired taker and if that person never lives up to expectations its easy to brush under the carpet.
__________________
BELIEVE IN THE SHIELD!
|
|
|
07-06-2012, 09:54 AM
|
#353 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,398
|
Re: Who should beat the Undertaker in WM?
It needs to end at some point. All streaks come to an end.
|
|
|
07-06-2012, 09:58 AM
|
#354 (permalink)
|
|
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,825
|
Re: Who should beat the Undertaker in WM?
If we assume that it MUST happen, then it'll be John Cena. This isn't a question of worthiness, it's a question of likelihood. Selecting anyone other than Cena is foolish.
__________________
NOBODY WOULD FOLLOW AN UNCHARISMATIC BORE LIKE YOU!
|
|
|
07-06-2012, 10:05 AM
|
#355 (permalink)
|
|
Moron
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Agrestic
Posts: 4,922
|
Re: Who should beat the Undertaker in WM?
Daniel Bryan. Would be a great match, and he could get revenge on Taker since he retired HBK.
|
|
|
07-06-2012, 10:07 AM
|
#356 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 146
|
Re: Who should beat the Undertaker in WM?
Someone once brought up the idea of Kane ending it, and I think that's a wonderful idea. However they would really have to bring back that monster in Kane and build him back up properly in what could be the war to finally settle the score, for Kane to finally get his decisive comeuppance on his big brother after all these years and losing twice at WM to his brother. I would rather the streak never end, but if they must, Kane would be the only one I would be cool with ending it, I think its a cool idea.
__________________

I'll get to the point this time, I want the Legend Killer back. *sad face*
|
|
|
07-06-2012, 10:14 AM
|
#357 (permalink)
|
|
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,825
|
Re: Who should beat the Undertaker in WM?
Kane ending the streak is a horrific idea. The whole point is that Undertaker has stacked up an incredible amount of heat/energy with his 20-0 streak, and a loss at WrestleMania would transmit that energy to whoever beats him. Is Kane, far closer to the end than the beginning, a worthy recipient of all that energy and heat?
Of course not. Whoever beats Undertaker at WrestleMania should be someone that can live off that heat/energy for years to come. Kane, obviously, does not fit the bill.
__________________
NOBODY WOULD FOLLOW AN UNCHARISMATIC BORE LIKE YOU!
|
|
|
07-06-2012, 10:24 AM
|
#358 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,385
|
Re: Who should beat the Undertaker in WM?
At some point people will realize that the Streak will never end.
__________________
|
|
|
07-06-2012, 10:27 AM
|
#359 (permalink)
|
|
Little Poppa Pump
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,224
|
Re: Who should beat the Undertaker in WM?
One thing to consider is that they can get further mileage out of the streak by having someone else try to match it someday. It's as big a deal as actually ending the streak and it preserves the streak itself. It's unlikely they'd have the inclination or even the consistency to manage it, but it is, in my opinion, one more argument in favor of having nobody end it.
|
|
|
07-06-2012, 12:39 PM
|
#360 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,203
|
Re: Who should beat the Undertaker in WM?
Nobody...
__________________
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|