[Sun-Tzu]

I think Brock and John Cena both would really good on his resume. Lets say he faces Brock at WM29 and then goes onto to face Cena at Wrestlemania 30.

[septurum]

I think he could certainly do it but I honestly think he is done. There is nothing left to prove for Taker. His last 4 Mania matches were all telling a simple story. Taker CANNOT be beaten at Mania. You'd have to kill him to win...so what would be the point in more matches?

[RyanPelley]

Originally Posted by septurum

I think he could certainly do it but I honestly think he is done. There is nothing left to prove for Taker. His last 4 Mania matches were all telling a simple story. Taker CANNOT be beaten at Mania. You'd have to kill him to win...so what would be the point in more matches?

But he's already dead!!!!!!! - Kayfabe, circa 1992.

[yomomma619]

Possible, but unnecessary. Like said above, he has nothing left to prove. He's done it all and there's really no point in continuing beyond what's already been done.

[Vic Capri]

I hope so. There's too much money to be made from Cena Vs. Undertaker. The biggest show needs the best main event possible.

- Vic

[Tyrion Lannister]

He doesn't need it, it would be stupid. 20 and 0 is a perfect number for him to go out on, the moment where him, HBK and HHH are all on the stage with each other is a fitting end to his career and pretty much the only thing on that PPV worthy of being called a "WrestleMania moment", and any Streak match from this point forward is anti-climactic. How do you sell a nearfall at Mania and have people believe it after what they've just seen? I'll admit it, there were certain times in that match...they had me. I was worried Triple H was going to end the Streak when HBK and HHH did the SCM/Pedigree combo. But after kicking out of everything he did at this Mania, it's done. He CAN'T lose. They couldn't convince me that Brock Lesnar and The Rock in a handicap match were a threat to the Streak after what we've seen this year.

[LarryCoon]

Of course he can. WM28 proved Undertaker can still go and deliver the best match by far in the whole company.

[TheDeadMan86]

Originally Posted by RyanPelley

But he's already dead!!!!!!! - Kayfabe, circa 1992.

You cannot kill what is already dead! - WWF War Zone, circa 1998.

[Wrestling02370]

I expect him to go to Wrestlemania 30. It will probably be based around his retirement and Hall of Fame induction, much like Ric Flair. Wrestlemania 30 will be all about The Undertaker.

[The Pied Piper]

Yeah, going against Cena at Wrestlemania 30 is like having your own private Andre vs Hogan as your swansong. That would be an honor to watch, I agree.

I have no idea who's he gonna face at WM 29, though. I just hope it's not another rematch with Kane or Orton or even Lord Tensai. Enough is enough. They need something new. I wish Borden would just sign with WWE once his TNA contract is over this year. He already stated he partially regretted not accepting Vince's offer to face Taker at WM 27 last year, WM 29 would be a prime time and may very well be the last chance for Taker vs Sting to ever happen.

Taker already fought Hogan, Austin, Rock, Bret, Cena, Warrior, Angle, Lesnar, and Mankind outside Wrestlemania. Taker already defeated Snuka, Roberts, Flair, HHH three times, HBK twice, Kane twice, Nash, Sid, Show, Orton, Batista, and Edge at Wrestlemania. Really, the only gigantic name he's left to face is Sting. Screw Goldberg, he was never relevant for a long time anyway. Sting vs Taker needs to happen at Wrestlemania 29.