Nobody remembers Germany losing the 2002 World Cup to Brazil. They remember Cafu lifting the trophy.
Nobody remembers Foreman losing to Ali. They remember Ali kicking his ass.
Yes they do, I hear many say "I was there" "I remember" and books about that
even then how many pepole who NEVER watched watched the last part becuse of that?
i know my parents did and I know many others that did as wel
See, winning is always bigger than losing. Not in this sport only, but in sports in general.
Yes winning is, but winning aginst someone who is undefeated is biiger then someone undefeated winning again which is my point
to have an undefeated guy be undefeated? that's what you can see every time you can only see them lose it once and its truly an amazing moment
pepole dont pay to see an outcome they see comming and they know is going to happen,t hats why they need to put taker with hbk, HHH, and tease him lossing so much pepole pay to see that because
WINNING against someone undefeated is a huge deal
Well, if I cannot name that then Taker/Kane at WM 14, Taker/HHH at WM 17, and Taker/Batista at WM 23 are still great choices for being memorable matches.
I never said they would not have any matches, or that you could not name them just that if and or when he losses that bmatch will insatnyl be a classic and will have pepole talking\buying dvds\ watching
When all is said and done, no matter what you will have Takers great matches, which are based off his performance, but people will also remember his loss far more the most of those, not all since he unlike most who arte undefeated had an IMPRESVIE showing
but again more will remember the match he lost then remember all the good matches he won
Many people had owed their future success to Taker by being put over by him. People like Mankind, Kane, Lesnar, and Orton for example.
And there are people who were put over by him but didn't use it wisely like Gonzales, Kennedy, Khali, Kozlov, and Heidenrich. I think when it comes to putting people over, Taker has done a fair share without actually using The Streak (bar Orton).
I do not deny he has put guys over, but there is no limit imo, he can still put over a young guy and start a new era.
There is no "fair shair" as one of the old guys THATS YOUR JOB, for as long as your still there your putting guys over
How many times do you see Nash being mentioned as the best ever? People mention the likes of Rock, Austin, Flair, HBK, Bret, HHH, Hogan, Taker, or even Cena or Lesnar, but where is Nash?
He is called the best ever at poltciing because of that, and i never said best ever, I just said it made him relevant to this day
If that's the definition of being MADE, then all the more reason I have not to let The Streak be broken.
No, what the defnition is, instead of being called deisail ro God forbid Oz he will go down as Nash and one of the first memorys will be him beating Goldberg and many other things as well
I did mention the DVDs. And merchandises.
I disagree, you can sell just as much if not more if he losses
put it this way he goes 22-0 people buy the dvd or what ever, THATS it since he is done there is no "milk it evere year" now, he wont be back to fight next year no more to add to the strea
there is no extra sell
pepole will buy if its 21-1 becuse it sells
you think pepole show up to watch him win like they know he will?
You think people breath stops when Taker wins again like always? no its always when taker is down for the one two
and evrey one stands up, many in disbelief before the kick out
Again, Vince won't let him end The Streak to anybody. HHH & Steph are on Vince's side. What they say is final.
I highly doubt this is "true", as even if it where\is it could chnage at anytime and even that if true thats cause they can still milk it next year, but hween he retires they wont be able to
right now there is no reason to end it cause you can still use it next year so of coruse he dont want it to end but his last match there is no exra for taker wining
WWE don't know how to book things properly anymore. Anybody who ends The streak will be buried in 6 months by the "Creative" team.
Even if this was true, this could be a step in the right direction,y ou cant just stop making right decisions just because they "mess things up"