[JY57]

Originally Posted by Stone Hot

http://www....................com/hu...estlemania-29/



you can only read this article if your a premium member to the website wrestling news world
Wow wwe if this is true then your idiots. Just give undertaker what he wants. He wants to be in a top match with top WM mania. Have him face Lesnar come on Vince do whats right for the fans and for business. Same with Austin pay him what he wants and he will wrestle at WM 30

Can't say I blame him (IF true that is).

Vince won't give him Brock because his son-in-law wants him. And Hunter & his ego comes first. And I seriously doubt Vince wants Punk anywhere near Rock/Cena II. Wants it to be between those two for business and wants Cena beat The Rock clean without a third party.

[JAROTO]

Originally Posted by JY57

Can't say I blame him (IF true that is).

Vince won't give him Brock because his son-in-law wants him. And Hunter & his ego comes first. And I seriously doubt Vince wants Punk anywhere near Rock/Cena II. Wants it to be between those two for business and wants Cena beat The Rock clean without a third party.

Business is business. No no one wants to see HHH/LESNAR at WM. Just do what's right and have TAKER/LESNAR.

And I don't get it...How is TAKER/PUNK considered less important than HHH/LESNAR? In fact TAKER/PUNK is the most popular match of the 3 rumored main events. I think it's not just about money... I think Taker wants to face Lesnar. He asked him at a UFC event and is a big MMA fan. It makes sense he wants that match.

[zep81]

Maybe it is the fact that Taker wants Brock, but Vince wont agree, as HHH is having him. Id be suprised if it just down to money tbh,

All these 'Insider' rumours always make me laugh, no-one knows for sure, although the Taker health issues one is a common phrase, but we all know that really. Its more than likely the most truthful one...

[JAROTO]

The only person who wants HHH/LESNAR over TAKER/LESNAR is HHH. All the WWE fans have years waiting for this match. Why not do the right thing? HHH doesn't need to beat Lesnar. On the other hand he is hurting his legacy with this stupid selfish attitude.

[Dexter Morgan]

Why should Taker get the leftovers? Feels like 2003 all over again.

[Rayfu]

Originally Posted by The Pied Piper

It would be incredibly moronic to call a destroyed streak "streak". Streak is something you have when it's still active.

Besides, 22-0 or 23-0 DVD sells better than say, 20-1?

But lets say he only goes to next year or the year after that
22-0 is fine and all but IMO people will pay to see the ending, pepole like seeing "history" making

they loved it when Andre lost, people always pay to see streaks not cause they are undefeated but the chance to see them lose
if he retires after this one
20-1 and 21-0 are the same IMO, all you do with 20-1 is give someone else something to go on rather then make the streak useless, and make a moment, how many of Andre matchs of his undefeated streak do you recall? how much do you watch? whats his most famous match?

How about Goldberg? whats one of his most famous matches?

when they lose, and I'd auger it would sell far better

No one cares about guys who where undefeated 30 years ago and NEVER EVER lost a match, it gets forgotten and laid to rest

Can you tell me, with out looking them up, teams\pepole\sports that where undefeated two decades ago?
Maybe you can, most cant, but they CAN tell you who lost, cause its a bigger moment

if he keeps wining so what? he always wins, but to see it end? that's HISTORY that's bigger then him wining

Was Goldberg's career the same after his 173-0 ended? Was Andre's career the same when his 15 years unbeaten run ended? Was Sammartino's career the same when his 7 years WWE title run came to an end? No, right?

But I'm saying his LST match, when there IS no carrea to be affected, and look at the people who beat them, they can for their rest of their lfies (for better or worse) use it
As been said before the most memorable (or top 3) moments is when they LOSE, had they won it would of been "just another match"
and even then, look at what Andre losing did, look at what Goldberg lossing did, ruin them? maybe, but it had for better worse WAY more impact then if they had won and been undefeated forever.

[JY57]

Originally Posted by JAROTO

The only person who wants HHH/LESNAR over TAKER/LESNAR is HHH. All the WWE fans have years waiting for this match. Why not do the right thing? HHH doesn't need to beat Lesnar. On the other hand he is hurting his legacy with this stupid selfish attitude.

IMO it should be Punk/Hunter & Brock/Taker seriously.

But whatever, just hope Brock/Hunter have a serious gimmick match and not talking about NO DQ, at this point and whatever coming it will be too personal for that shit. Have a feeling the match would be much better that way.

[JoseBxNYC]

The only thing that would make me smile is fans chanting we want Taker during the Lesnar/Hunter build up. His ego would be crushed.

[Dexter Morgan]

I hope that happens.

[rohisawesome34]

im perfectly happy with the way the wrestlemania card is this year i love rematches as a matter of fact the 2nd time always winds up being better than the 1st. hhh vs lesnar 2 will be a great match and i think a stipulation will be added to it like nodq, street fight etc. itll be fun. cena vs rock 2 im all for and i think the rematch will blow away the 1st match they had. i thought the mania 28 match was somewhat dissapointing and i said i have a feeling their holding back for the 2nd match so thats what i think will happen. punk vs taker will be great and be better then the matches they had back in 2009 this will be the marquee match of all of them. and sheamus vs orton will be a fun match too. so yeah im perfectly happy with this rumored card it looks like a lot of fun and i cant wait to see them all live april 7th at metlife stadium in jersey!