De-Unify the belts at EC - Page 4 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 02-15-2014, 01:04 AM   #31 (permalink)
Styles Clash.
 
Superkick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Silverdome
Posts: 5,916
Superkick is making a name for themselvesSuperkick is making a name for themselvesSuperkick is making a name for themselvesSuperkick is making a name for themselvesSuperkick is making a name for themselvesSuperkick is making a name for themselvesSuperkick is making a name for themselvesSuperkick is making a name for themselvesSuperkick is making a name for themselvesSuperkick is making a name for themselvesSuperkick is making a name for themselves
Default Re: De-Unify the belts at EC

They need to re-organize the brand split and de-unify the WWEWHC titles. That way, guys like Sandow and Ambrose could at least have the chance to shine on SD, going after the WHC. Instead, now, they will be rather irrelevant.
__________________
Superkick is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 02-15-2014, 01:07 AM   #32 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
NapperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 606
NapperX should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsNapperX should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsNapperX should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsNapperX should be embarassed if they have more than 50 posts
Default Re: De-Unify the belts at EC

Quote:
Originally Posted by xdryza View Post
Why would need 2 World titles if the Brand Extension is gone. LMAO
You have more shows which equals more programming, more wrestlers, an extra hour of Raw, and a pointless tag team division and more Ppvs. The wrong titles were merged/unified. In 2002 or 2003 HHH defeated Kane and therefore unified his title with the intercontinental title only for the Intercontinental title to be re-activated a short months later even during the "Brand Extension". World Champion and Intercontinental Champion pretty much mean the same thing, but in the earlier days the IC title was won by the hardest working wrestler. WWE had it right with HHH Vs Kane in 2002 or 2003 when the titles were unified.
__________________
I believe in the Thumperian Principle.
NapperX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2014, 07:10 AM   #33 (permalink)
Getting over in the mid-card
 
Freeloader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,671
Freeloader Freeloader Freeloader Freeloader Freeloader Freeloader Freeloader Freeloader Freeloader Freeloader Freeloader
Default Re: De-Unify the belts at EC

Troll post, lol @ people biting on this
__________________
http://www.wrestlingforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic205268_1.gif
Freeloader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2014, 02:06 PM   #34 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
NotTheRealOwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Knottingley, UK
Posts: 860
NotTheRealOwen NotTheRealOwen NotTheRealOwen NotTheRealOwen
Default Re: De-Unify the belts at EC

To be honest, I think WWE worked best when 1 PPV was put on by RAW, then the next by SD, yet all the big 4 were shared. However, I've always thought a good idea would be to have both RAW and SD seem sort of like a division, one for the IC title, the other for the US, yet if you're the champion you appear on both shows, and whoever is feuding with the champion/in the title picture could also flick between shows a little more. Not a brilliant idea, but it's just a thought
__________________

"He's got the whole world, in his hands"

One nation, Under Kolo.

Last edited by NotTheRealOwen : 02-15-2014 at 02:07 PM. Reason: typo
NotTheRealOwen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2014, 02:12 PM   #35 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 66
I'm An AJ LEE Guy
Default Re: De-Unify the belts at EC

I am against splitting the titles. It made no sense to have two major champions. World, IC, US, and tag is enough.
I'm An AJ LEE Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2014, 12:53 PM   #36 (permalink)
Oxi
BANKS
 
Oxi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 9,338
Oxi is making a name for themselvesOxi is making a name for themselvesOxi is making a name for themselvesOxi is making a name for themselvesOxi is making a name for themselvesOxi is making a name for themselvesOxi is making a name for themselvesOxi is making a name for themselvesOxi is making a name for themselvesOxi is making a name for themselvesOxi is making a name for themselves
Default Re: De-Unify the belts at EC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larfleeze View Post
The only way to split the belts that would make any sense at all would be to have Sandow cash in his "real" briefcase that he retrieved from the ocean
This makes literally no sense because it's not the briefcase, it's the contract. Why is this escaped on so many people?

The most logical way is to just say "Woops we fucked up lol we don't know how to book things right. Back to basics!"
__________________

Oxi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios