Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: May 2012
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Rhodes vs. Sandow...Makes No Sense!
How many times in the last two weeks have we heard Michael Cole say "Sandow stole the briefcase from Cody."? How many times have we heard Cole say something like that and imply Sandow cheated to win. Last time I checked, there were was only one rule in a MITB Ladder match...there are all no rules! But yet WWE is trying to make it seem like that Sandow cheated to win, when noting of the sort happened.
I get it, they are best friends and Sandow did stab him in the back. But the fact that Rhodes just straight up attacked Sandow the next night on Raw didn't make Rhodes look sympathetic like he was the night before. It makes him look like nothing but a sore loser.
What they should have done (and I know I'm going to come as a know it all) is have Rhodes continue to stand beside Sandow as his best friend and protector of the case. Sandow would continually run Rhodes down. Sandow loses a match, It's Rhodes fault, even if it wasn't and so and so forth until one day Rhodes snaps and then we get to see them feud.
I know WWE wanted to build this up quickly for Summerslam but it's hurting what could have been a much better story.
What do you think?