WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars? - Page 7 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #61 of 85 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 10:01 AM
Witty Custom User Title
 
Dirtnose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: England
Posts: 715
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
           
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?

People on this forum overuse the word buried ffs. Someone losing a match doesn't equate to a burial.
Dirtnose is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #62 of 85 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 10:37 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Strongside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 907
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtnose View Post
People on this forum overuse the word buried ffs. Someone losing a match doesn't equate to a burial.
THIS.
Strongside is offline  
post #63 of 85 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 02:26 PM
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Mephis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 260
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?

You want a buried tag team? Primo and Epico say hi.
Mephis is offline  
post #64 of 85 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 02:40 PM
Quiet Humanoids!
 
TehBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sin City, Lost Wages
Posts: 788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                   
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?

More worried about them splitting up Rhodes Schollars, a tag team that actually fits together than I am with them burying them. It's the same thing WWE has done for years. Get a tag team that works, pick one you like better, split them up and push them as singles. Going back to NAO, they tried to push billy gunn far before they should have and completely wrong. They did the same thing with WGTT splitting them to push Benjamin, again way before they should have and completely wrong, again it failed. For some reason they've gotten into the mindset that every tag team is the rockers or the heart foundation and if you break them up you're going to get a Shawn Michaels or Bret Heart. Ignorance.




TehBrain is offline  
post #65 of 85 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 02:59 PM
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 421
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullydully View Post
If they were being buried, they wouldn't have been given quite a big in ring segment with the Rock on Smackdown a few weeks back, and they wouldn't be getting Title shots. Besides, I think they'll win the Titles at the Rumble.
Like someone said La Resistance had an in ring segment with the Rock, and even though they were tag champs they were Jobbers with a capital J.

As for getting title shots, who cares? Zach Ryder had a match for the WWE Championship against Sheamus, so I guess Ryder is a main eventer right? R-Truth had a WWE title match too, see my point?
It doesn't matter if you get title shots if all you do is LOSE.

And RS are not winning the titles at RR.
IF, they 'win' it will be by DQ or countout so that Hell No retain the titles like at HIAC.
Why would Vince take the titles from Kane and Daniel freaking Bryan to give them to these two who, even though I like them, are no where near the level of two former world champs. The only team credible to take the titles from THN are the Shield, and maybe Dolph and Big E if they ever decided to form a tag team (which is unlikely).

RS vs THN is a case similar to Eve vs Kaitlyn. Do you think if Eve hadn't left Kaitlyn would have won the title?
RS are just there to make THN look good, and they are doing a good job.
BronzeWarrior1989 is offline  
post #66 of 85 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 06:54 PM Thread Starter
Learning to break kayfabe
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
   
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn Morrison View Post
. yeah obviously they are being 'buried' (jobbing to the point of no return) Obviously, i mean isn't that why they get a segment pretty much every week on Raw and SD? Isn't that why they are challenging for the tag-titles at Royal Rumble? Totally being buried. Idiot.
When the hell, besides the segment w/ The Rock did they get a big in ring segment? And did you read why I said what I said? I even made a disclaimer stating that "bury" isn't the best word in the scenario, and now I realize it. Idiot.
The_IC_Champ is offline  
post #67 of 85 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 08:06 PM
I put the "W" in WWE!
 
cesaro_ROCKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: US
Posts: 10,874
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
                     
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?

oh look, team Hell No is opening promoting their championship match. OP, are you happy?

Join the Greatest Group on WF: Cesaro World Order




The Swiss Superman
cesaro_ROCKS is offline  
post #68 of 85 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 10:01 PM
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
WWER3volution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: North America
Posts: 273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
   
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?

yeah just cause they didnt air on one ep of raw doesnt mean there getting buried they have a title match at royal rumble there getting the complete opposite......


Check out my channel for all the best WWE Content,Montages,Classic Matches,Fantasy Matchups"TheWWER3volution" on youtube! Join the Revolution!
youtube.com/thewwer3volution
WWER3volution is offline  
post #69 of 85 (permalink) Old 01-26-2013, 12:33 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Gareth Mallroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: On the grassy knoll
Posts: 675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
   
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?

They are booking them pretty bad, but I'm more worried about the Primetime Players. They should be in the title hunt, and on TV.
Gareth Mallroy is offline  
post #70 of 85 (permalink) Old 01-26-2013, 12:36 PM
Getting over in the mid-card
 
bigdog40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 6,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtnose View Post
People on this forum overuse the word buried ffs. Someone losing a match doesn't equate to a burial.



Exactly, if it were up to the IWC, most of the matches would either be a DQ, and all the top guys will lose via upset to every up and coming wrestler out there and in terms, no one would truly get over

Quote:
Originally Posted by new_guy View Post
People complain about newer talent not getting over, but what they mean is that their favourite isn't getting over, everyone else can go to hell. I'm for as many people getting over as possible, it would improve the show and the more over people there are, the more avenues there are to push new talent, yes, your favourites are more likely to get pushed if there are more over people to feud with.
bigdog40 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome