Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
Join Date: Aug 2007
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Re: Smackdown 10/12, Main Event, Superstars & SMS Spoilers
How come most of you haven't learned not to argue with vanboxmeer? He has an agenda when he posts to try to stir the pot with people that post positive about Bryan, just ignore him and he'll go away.
And the tag team champions main eventing a WWE show once again...
You've never had any pertinent points other than blind faith in Team Steph to counter-argue about Bryan. Fact is this company has for a decade killed off talent after talent to the point where their house show business is dying a death, Smackdown has become Jakked, and television ratings are ever inching closer to TNA levels. This is the same booking committee that jobbed him in 18 seconds and then wanted to do the Del Rio/Sheamus program immediately afterwards. Nothing's really changed. With such a notoriously bad reputation of really building up ANY talents, why should anyone have confidence that they'd truly go with Bryan as anything more than what they've shown over and over again. An enhancement talent.
I do have one question for anyone who might feel that Dwayne Johnson "owes" the business. Is it just him, or is it anyone who moved on to other things? Should Luna Vachon get heat for running a towing company instead of working on RAW? Should Maven be critiqued on his Home Shopping Network bits instead of wrestling?
Or is it only the ones who go on to highly visible careers in movies that owe something? Why do Johnson (who left after putting people over, doing the traditionally "right thing") and Lesnar (who did not; except for making Eddie a legitimate star) get called sell-outs who "forgot where they came from" when someone who retires to do some regular job get credit (as they should) for moving on and making it without falling into a sea of addiction?