You donít understand, Iím not against having comedy in wrestling. Hell one of my favorite wrestlers during his peak was Crash Holly when he was dominating the Hardcore title scene. He was the definition of a natural goofy entertainer and played his role to perfection, guys like Mahal and Lance Storm who has personalities of a old wooden broom stick donít cut it. But straight to the point in hand, McIntyre and Mahal are the wrong wrestlers to be tagging along with Slater and they all donít have any chemistry with each other. The only thing these three have in common are theyíre all bottom of the barrel jobbers (except Mahal somewhat).
People are so easily pleased with random ass tag teaming Heels just like Ziggler/Swagger or Rhodes/Sandow when they donít have any chemistry with each other. The ONLY thing I can see some people are happy for is that their favorite wrestler within the three are getting air time now, period.
Okay, I get your point with the chemistry thing.
But I think Rhodes and Sandow for example have a good chemistry. Ziggler/Swagger.. nah...
Well.. i don't know what they thought when they put these 3 together, I can only quote GothicBohemian
But things that are hilarious for all the wrong reasons are what I laugh the hardest at.
Of course, they don't make ANY sense right now. And I don't think they do in the future. But that's the whole point about them.
They are so shitty, that it is great at some point. And who knows, maybe they build up some chemistry in the future.. or maybe that'll be some kind steppingstone.
Not to become some stupid dance-entertainers, maybe they can show what they can do, what they're capable of.. and as long as you can get some fans on your side or show them something they didn't expect..it's a good thing.
Of course that's a question of interpretation, what you like, what your interests are, taste etc..
But I, now, enjoying these 3 and wanna see, what that's all about. Maybe it's just an experiment for WWE.. we never know.