Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Feb 2012
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If WWE is going to create a future top heel, Mahal is the better choice.
First off, he isn't a complete rip off. Sandows gimmick has no originality, is boring as hell, and the only people that care about him are the marks on this forum. This guy comes out to absolute silence when he comes out, his attire and his cartwheel taunt is as cringe-wrothy as Brodus Clays dancing. Its only a matter of time before this guy turns into the new Drew McIntyre.
As for Mahal, he has the total packagae. He can be a top heel, his camel clutch is a devastating finisher, he can basically be when Muhammed Haassan couldnt, exxcept Mahal is a better wrestler and is more of a draw for the Indian market. It makes me sick they wasted him on Ryback on a throwaway match on RAW, they could have built this until Hell in a Cell, with Mahal playing mind games with Ryback leading up and Mahal continuing to squash jobbers just as Ryback has, then have these two face off at HIAC. Obviously Ryback goes over, but Mahal still comes out looking strong and credible seeing as how he gave Ryback his first real challenge.
What are your thoughts, my favorite Wrestling forum?
Top three favorite wrestlers of ALL TIME
(Have had a change of heart, last updated 07-25-14)