Team Rhodes Scholars - Page 8 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #71 of 120 (permalink) Old 09-28-2012, 02:09 PM
Proud #NewBlack
 
Sith Rollins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 18,994
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
                     
Re: Newly formed tag team.

I could see them breaking up after a DB and Kane feud. Just dont see team Hell No losing the titles so early in their run. Dont know how long the feud would go for.


Sig by ChampviaDQ aka Da Graphics GAWD
Sith Rollins is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #72 of 120 (permalink) Old 09-28-2012, 02:21 PM
Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
 
DoubleDeckerBar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,163
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
                     
Re: Newly formed tag team.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatOne. View Post
Kane and Bryan really aren't that bigger deals, Rhodes and Sandow beat them individually last week.
... With the help of outside interference. Kane was about to Chokeslam Sandow and Bryan was about to put the No Lock on Rhodes. Without the outside interference Kane and Bryan would've gotten routine wins.

Anyway, the gap between Rhodes/Sandow and Kane/Bryan is a lot closer than the gap between Rhodes/Sandow and The Uso's, they're literally bottom of the barrel JOBBERS. The Uso's job all the time on flaming NXT to developmental guys.

Based on their careers so far it goes...

Kane

Bryan






Rhodes




Sandow




































































































Uso's

Quote:
I realise where they're going and that WWE will push Roman Reigns straight to the top. However for me, Dean Ambrose is by far the most talented in that group and I think eventually if they just give him the spotlight then he's going to shine. As soon as he touches a mic everyone else can just sit down as he's magic on it. So It remains to be seen, I think they're all talented but to me Dean was the star of that group. I think Roman looks like the star of that group but I don't think he's nearly as talented as Dean.


- Batista

Last edited by DoubleDeckerBar; 09-28-2012 at 02:24 PM.
DoubleDeckerBar is offline  
post #73 of 120 (permalink) Old 09-28-2012, 02:26 PM
Searching for a new identity
 
1andOnlyDobz!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cymru
Posts: 5,530
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: Newly formed tag team.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleDeckerBar View Post
No. This whole "Who is the HBK and who is the Jannety" argument needs to stop, both are talented young superstars that will have big roles to play in the companys future.

Anyway, Matthews said on Smackdown that he talked to Rhodes and Sandow before the show and they acknowledged that they weren't a "real tag team" so the whole one guy will become great while the other is doomed for failure won't happen with these two anyway.

I didn't like them coming out to Rhodes music though, with a name like "Rhodes Scholars" Sandow's music would've been more appropriate, although that's probably just my blind bias as I like Sandow more.

The Uso's got FAR too much offence in that match by the way, it should have been a straight up squash.
Rhodes is the more established plus his theme music packs more of a punch. WWE made the right decision. I remember their attack on Bryan and Kane on RAW and Sandow's music played. Didn't work as well as it would have if it were Rhodes'. Nothing to do with the two superstars themselves but theme-wise, Rhodes' is the way to go if they pick one or the other.


1andOnlyDobz! is offline  
post #74 of 120 (permalink) Old 09-28-2012, 02:29 PM
Goatin' ain't easy
 
The GOAT One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London
Posts: 1,157
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
               
Re: Newly formed tag team.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoupMan Prime View Post
I could see them breaking up after a DB and Kane feud. Just dont see team Hell No losing the titles so early in their run. Dont know how long the feud would go for.
Don't think they'll lose the belts yet, Rhodes and Sandow are filler as they're both not doing much ATM.

Sandow will be main eventing soon (with the help of HHH) and Rhodes won't be far behind, thats why I'm saying people shouldn't be too worried out them i n this team together. Just enjoy it, they're very entertaining together,

The GOAT One is offline  
post #75 of 120 (permalink) Old 09-28-2012, 02:33 PM
FEAR THE BROCKTAGON
 
JY57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 11,529
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
                     
Re: Newly formed tag team.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoupMan Prime View Post
I could see them breaking up after a DB and Kane feud. Just dont see team Hell No losing the titles so early in their run. Dont know how long the feud would go for.
I think it will only be HIAC and the RAW after it. Even though there is only 3 weeks from HIAC to SS. Really depends on what they plan for SS (have a title match or include tag teams in those 5 on 5 battles)

if they do I think Rey & Cara vs Kane & Bryan at SS.
JY57 is offline  
post #76 of 120 (permalink) Old 09-29-2012, 09:58 PM
Little Poppa Pump
 
Sarcasm1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,231
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Why do they have to put Sandow and Rhodes into a team?

I don't like it. These guys are singles superstars. This tag team run could ruin one of them. What was wrong with PTP, Mysterio/Cara, and the other tag teams?

Sarcasm1 is offline  
post #77 of 120 (permalink) Old 09-29-2012, 10:01 PM
My Name Is God (I Hate You)
 
Honey Bucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tits
Posts: 7,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why do they have to put Sandow and Rhodes into a team?

I hope and pray it's only temporary. Not that I dislike them as a team, but they're better off on their own. Really, I think it's a combination of WWE building their tag team division by using proper talent, and gaining heat by facing Kane and Daniel Bryan.

"Yes, I can hear you Clem Fandango!"
Honey Bucket is offline  
post #78 of 120 (permalink) Old 09-29-2012, 10:09 PM
BULLS
 
Chrome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Indy
Posts: 9,477
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why do they have to put Sandow and Rhodes into a team?

Only reason I like it is because it gives Rhodes something to do, who had been stuck in no-man's land since losing the IC title. Otherwise I agree, they're both better off as singles competitors, especially Sandow, who has been on a nice roll recently.

Chrome is offline  
post #79 of 120 (permalink) Old 09-29-2012, 10:17 PM
FEAR THE BROCKTAGON
 
JY57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 11,529
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why do they have to put Sandow and Rhodes into a team?

after HIAC or SS they will likely separate
JY57 is offline  
post #80 of 120 (permalink) Old 09-29-2012, 11:47 PM
THE CONQUEROR
 
RatedR10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,277
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why do they have to put Sandow and Rhodes into a team?

Probably because both have nothing to do right now and they want to feature them both. Great way to do so in putting them in a team in a newly revived tag team division.



"It's going to be great. I can't wait for the crowd, the noise, the energy in the building. I can't wait to take that all away from them."
- PK Subban
RatedR10 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome