JasonLives

Yeah you are correct.
The big difference though is Daniel Bryan and CM Punk. Their big feuds with Joe happened on the indy scene.
Had Joe never had those feuds with Bryan or CM Punk he would have never been on that list. Or they could have just added Kaz.

There is no point in writing "Btw, he now wrestles on Impact Wrestling".

MTheBehemoth

And the point of mentioning his match with Kobashi is...?

__________________

Outlaw91

true
Joe's chant was "Joe's gonna kill you"

__________________

why2cj

__________________

tbp82

Calm down Joe. If you go on a low carb diet, get a tan, shave your head, and get your fellow Samoan to hook you up with his ahem "supplement" plan you'd have the superstar look to.

joeisgonnakillyou

The superstar look crap again...

__________________

nevereveragainu

this is wwe we're talking about

a company that would never give any free advertising even from word of mouth to a rival promotion or uncontracted wrestler unless they were working for WWE or at least practically

__________________

Boygirl

lol this contrasts to how advertising is practiced in my country where companies openly badmouth a rival company in their Twitter accounts. It's mainly because we're very personal (not professional) in nature, and are very accustomed to word-of-mouth.

On TNA's part, they are smart too by presenting themselves in an underdog and family-oriented light, and frame WWE as the "other company".

tbp82

It was within the conversation of why I think Vince hasn't raided TNA talent.

nevereveragainu

how? it makes them look bush leaguebecause TNA's guys are under contract?

__________________