Originally Posted by King_Of_This_World
In Dixies own words 'TNA are losing millions' by cutting the PPV's, so I dont know where you get this insane idea that they are saving money by doing less of them.
Costs were very low to do them in the IZ, they were always profitable.
I don't get your point.
Dixies tried for a rather long time cutting these PPVs which wasn't possible for varius reasons. And they still do the taped stipulation PPVs for the international market to fullfill their contractual obligations overseas.
So, are your saying Dixie trys to "lose millions by cutting the PPVs" and that for quite some time now? I know Dixie is not known for her business sense, but she isn't that stupid.
According to the sheets TNA needs (if I remember correctly) something like 12k buys for an IZ PPV to get even. Not sure where you see all these millions get lost!?!
Could you please post that interview in which Dixie allegedly said they were LOSING money by cutting the ppvs?
Why would they do it if there was any truth to that?
Originally Posted by Theproof
You WWE marks can try to spin it anyway you want. You don't spend this kind of money on something like this if you don't see something as a threat. And yeah, it's going to be a lot of money if they plan on going through with this.
As you quoted me before writing this I think it is at least partly directed at me.
It's kinda funny how some people think everyone who does not think TNA is the greatest product on the planet is a WWE mark. Especially when there was nothing good nor bad said about either product in the previous post. Wait, that's wrong. I said TNA's product got better. Obvious WWE mark is obvious?!?
Sounds a little bit like an inferiority complex to me.
Obviously could be wrong with that too.