View Poll Results: Should TNA have allowed Jeff Hardy to keep the title despite being unable to show up?

**RuthStar** · 01-19-2013, 04:17 PM

I'm shaking my head at people lambasting Jeff for this, Wrestlers can't demand to be champions, Its creative/higher ups/management who are to blame here, I'm sure Jeff himself didn't demand to be champion and advertise himself on the posters, The Blame for this cock up right here has to go to TNA, not Jeff, TNA should have put the belt on Daniels, Had Aces and Eights interfer mid match and Daniels took advantage, He could've kept the belt till Lockdown, Jeff could've won it back, least Daniels would've had a nice reward for his loyalty to TNA.. *sigh*

phreddie spaghetti · 01-19-2013, 04:19 PM

Styles/Daniels for the vacant World title?

MM10 · 01-19-2013, 04:19 PM

AJ needs to come back, and point out this whole thing. Then he needs to go on a tear, and not stop until he gets his belt back. This could save the UK shows.

Jeff Hardy Hater · 01-19-2013, 04:20 PM

Okay, and? Because WWE makes bad decisions, that means that TNA should too?

This is inexcusable for TNA to advertise him, and leave him champ.

How the fuck can you act like this isn't a big deal? This is fucking ridiculous. I'm so done with this company. Amazing workers, horrible management.

MM10 · 01-19-2013, 04:20 PM

AJ needs to come back, and point out this whole thing. Then he needs to go on a tear, and not stop until he gets his belt back. This could save the UK shows.

WRESTLINGMASTER23 · 01-19-2013, 04:29 PM

I'm just pointing out that wrestling companies for many years, from WCW, ECW and promotions back in the 1980's, they would advertise there top stars for shows, but then they pull them from the card.

If your so upset with TNA, don't watch them then. Your a Jeff Hardy hater anyway, so I thought you be quite happy he is not on the show.

I actually do say that TNA has made a big mistake advertising Jeff Hardy, but its not like we have not seen this before.

The Dude · 01-19-2013, 04:36 PM

Dont Get me wrong im a HUGE Hardy fan but yes keeping the title on him and off tv for a month was a bad call. should have had him drop it to Daniels and then upon return to Florida have the two Fued for the belt. but once again its Hogan and Dixie killing TNA all sorts of dead. Hardy is probably my favorite wrestler of all time (just a personal opinion thing) but I would watch him weather he had the belt or not. So him keeping it so it cant be on tv or a month worth of live shows is just a bad move. TNA just needs to write Hardy back in when you stateside! it isnt rocketry!

Cydius · 01-19-2013, 04:44 PM

They could focus on who will be the next challenger for Lockdown. They don't need to switch the belt for 4 impacts. More importantly they should not have a title change on TV when the champion has a long reign.

**Amber B** · 01-19-2013, 04:54 PM

Why the fuck would any of you want Daniels to have the title for only four episodes when you know that he would lose it back to Hardy once they're back in the States?

Sting came back at the time that he did because they knew that Hardy wasn't going no damn where near the UK. That wasn't a last minute decision.
They're going to do a ton of pretapes, probably a number one contender tournament and keep it moving. Those large and in charge Hardy fans must be pissed overseas, though.

Jeff Hardy Hater · 01-19-2013, 05:03 PM

So that the champion could show up for four episodes? Sorry, I forgot, it's better to just have inner monologues of the champion in a different country, instead of, you know, having him be there.

View Poll Results: Should TNA have allowed Jeff Hardy to keep the title despite being unable to show up?

Thread Tools