 |
|
12-16-2012, 05:52 PM
|
#51 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 579
|
Re: The future of TNA in your hands...
Quote:
Originally Posted by 316jon316
And WWE was built on old NWA/territory stars, so whats your point?
|
WWF was built on taking established star names and nationalizing their own territory into a worldwide promotion. If TNA does that I would have zero complaints. If WWF took Hillbilly Jim and gave him the World title and had him wrestle in a studio everyweek, I doubt they would be as successful.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
12-16-2012, 05:54 PM
|
#52 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 329
|
Re: The future of TNA in your hands...
You really want to start that argument?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave303159
i can't believe that some of you whine so much about this angle. if you are unhappy with TNA, go back and watch the crap WWE puts out.
|
|
|
|
12-16-2012, 06:02 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 579
|
Re: The future of TNA in your hands...
Its not even an argument. Its fact. TNA didnt gobble up all the best talent in the world like the WWF did. WWF took AWA's biggest names in Hogan, Heenan, Okerlund, Hennig, they made Andre exclusive to the New York territory, they took all of Stu Hart's best workers, they took Piper, Bundy, Studd, Kamala, Orndorff and a host of others from various other territories and mixed them all together with major celebrities.
How is this even comparable to TNA putting the best on wrestlers the WWE dont want anymore. I would love to hear your argument. Dont bother though because I will reply with a long laugh.
|
|
|
12-16-2012, 06:06 PM
|
#54 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 329
|
Re: The future of TNA in your hands...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave303159
i can't believe that some of you whine so much about this angle. if you are unhappy with TNA, go back and watch the crap WWE puts out.
|
|
|
|
12-16-2012, 06:08 PM
|
#55 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 579
|
Re: The future of TNA in your hands...
Did you not realise that you actually brought up the WWF and not me? Did I say I expected them to do that? I'm replying to you. Talk about losing track of your own argument.
|
|
|
12-16-2012, 06:09 PM
|
#56 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 329
|
Re: The future of TNA in your hands...
You are a joke my buddy. Do you get kicks from riding Vince pipe.
You are talking about Vince being on an even playing field with the other territories, if not better position, compared to TNA which like I said they started from scratch. Don't be mad.
But no you are right, TNA should have been way bigger than WWE right now or at least came up with Nexus or else they suck period.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave303159
i can't believe that some of you whine so much about this angle. if you are unhappy with TNA, go back and watch the crap WWE puts out.
|
|
|
|
12-16-2012, 06:12 PM
|
#57 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 579
|
Re: The future of TNA in your hands...
I think you need to read this thread again. I never said any of that. I was replying to you going completely off topic by bringing up how WWF was built on the back of territory stars so its ok for TNA to be built of WWE stars. I was actually showing you how the two things are completely different and no way relevant to this discussion. Again, well done for not knowing what you are talking about.
|
|
|
12-16-2012, 06:13 PM
|
#58 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 329
|
Re: The future of TNA in your hands...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Power
Did you not realise that you actually brought up the WWF and not me? Did I say I expected them to do that? I'm replying to you. Talk about losing track of your own argument.
|
If you actually look back, I was making fun of your constant childish behavior on here, sorry you don't get it.
I Love Vince, Literally = you
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave303159
i can't believe that some of you whine so much about this angle. if you are unhappy with TNA, go back and watch the crap WWE puts out.
|
|
|
|
12-16-2012, 06:16 PM
|
#59 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 329
|
Re: The future of TNA in your hands...
I just think it's funny, that you like to get on here, and attempt to belittle everybody's opinion because you have a crush on Vince, that's all.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave303159
i can't believe that some of you whine so much about this angle. if you are unhappy with TNA, go back and watch the crap WWE puts out.
|
|
|
|
12-16-2012, 06:16 PM
|
#60 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 579
|
Re: The future of TNA in your hands...
Well that isn't a childish response at all. I get being exposed as someone who isn't very knowledgeable about wrestling is a bit of a bitch, but there is no need to throw your toys out of your crib.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|