TNA is not stagnating, they are growing. - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 10-03-2012, 03:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Brian Styles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 721
Brian Styles Brian Styles
Default TNA is not stagnating, they are growing.

This is my point - WWE pulled 3.5m viewers while TNA consistently pulls 1.4-1.8m. RAW used to have triple the audience and now they struggle to have double. This isn't a decline in WWE or stagnation from TNA. It is the change in TV audiences. TNA has maintained their ratings since about 2008 while WWE has fallen off a cliff, 5.5m viewers per episode down to 3.5m. Network TV shows get renewed at 2.0 or above while in 2008 anything less than 3.0 was considered a joke. That is a 33% decline.

That 33% is pretty accurate for WWEs' decline since 2008 while with TNAs' stagnation it could be argued TNA has instead grown 33%. That is how I look at it, it makes more sense as 2008 to 2012 is like comparing an Apple to a Lobster, you can't do it.


So - Hogan, Hardy and good booking have led to a rise of 33%. That seems about right.
__________________
Currently marking out for:
WWE-
Brock Lesnar, Dolph Ziggler, Daniel Bryan, Chris Jericho, CM Punk.

TNA-
Austin Aries, AJ Styles, Bully Ray, Bobby Roode, Jeff Hardy, James Storm, Kurt Angle.

Indy:
Mike Bennett, Joey Ryan.
Brian Styles is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 10-03-2012, 03:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
MCMXCII
 
A$AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,298
A$AP has made a name for themselvesA$AP has made a name for themselvesA$AP has made a name for themselvesA$AP has made a name for themselvesA$AP has made a name for themselvesA$AP has made a name for themselvesA$AP has made a name for themselvesA$AP has made a name for themselvesA$AP has made a name for themselvesA$AP has made a name for themselvesA$AP has made a name for themselves
Default Re: TNA is not stagnating, they are growing.

Cool story bro.

But like you stated yourself, TV viewership is down in general. It's hard to pinpoint where the problem is considering the amount of factors that tie into what that rating is.
__________________


A$AP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 03:31 PM   #3 (permalink)
Convinced Vince to make me a Main-Eventer
 
joeisgonnakillyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 10,038
joeisgonnakillyou needs to make some friendsjoeisgonnakillyou needs to make some friendsjoeisgonnakillyou needs to make some friendsjoeisgonnakillyou needs to make some friendsjoeisgonnakillyou needs to make some friendsjoeisgonnakillyou needs to make some friendsjoeisgonnakillyou needs to make some friendsjoeisgonnakillyou needs to make some friendsjoeisgonnakillyou needs to make some friendsjoeisgonnakillyou needs to make some friendsjoeisgonnakillyou needs to make some friends
Default Re: TNA is not stagnating, they are growing.

TNA's brand is growing because of international exposure, but as a television show in america "impact wrestling" is losing audience... it's a fact.

The american pro wrestling business is stagnated.
__________________


The reason why we don't get fresh ideas and promotions rising in American Pro Wrestling is because the majority of the community is happy with the same old shit and will reject any chance of change. There is a risk in doing new things, 9 times out of 10, it leads to 50+ pages of bitching and moaning. While business gets turned into a dictatorship and more and more out of touch. Support the indies, support New Pro Wrestling.
joeisgonnakillyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 05:40 PM   #4 (permalink)
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Liverpoolkelly7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 482
Liverpoolkelly7 Liverpoolkelly7
Default Re: TNA is not stagnating, they are growing.

Do TNA have bad ratings in the US because wrestling isnt the same as it was 10-15 years ago or??
__________________
FUCK RATINGS & "WHATS BEST FOR BUSINESS", I WANNA BE ENTERTAINED!
Liverpoolkelly7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 05:49 PM   #5 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,096
nevereveragainu nevereveragainu
Default Re: TNA is not stagnating, they are growing.

igrowing? into what shoes?
nevereveragainu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 08:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
TNAmarkFromIndia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: India
Posts: 1,591
TNAmarkFromIndia should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsTNAmarkFromIndia should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsTNAmarkFromIndia should be embarassed if they have more than 50 posts
Default Re: TNA is not stagnating, they are growing.

You compared Raw's current rating with their best ever rating. Impact's best viewership was 3 million for the opening hour of the January 4, 2010 show, so that makes their current viewership less than of their best viewership.

Even if we're not comparing it to their best viewership, TNA used to do 1.6-1.8 million in 2011, and now they're doing 1.1-1.4 million, so it's a big drop. TNA's ratings are not growing.

Last edited by TNAmarkFromIndia : 10-03-2012 at 08:17 PM.
TNAmarkFromIndia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 08:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
11rob2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,694
11rob2k needs to take rep more serious11rob2k needs to take rep more serious11rob2k needs to take rep more serious11rob2k needs to take rep more serious11rob2k needs to take rep more serious11rob2k needs to take rep more serious11rob2k needs to take rep more serious11rob2k needs to take rep more serious
Default Re: TNA is not stagnating, they are growing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverpoolkelly7 View Post
Do TNA have bad ratings in the US because wrestling isnt the same as it was 10-15 years ago or??
The rating systems isn't the same as it was 15 years ago either, popularity in wrestling is way down it's a know fact wrestling shows aren't pulling in the live crowds as much as they did in the 90's. Ratings are also bad but you cant really compare them that much to the ratings in the 90's since now people watch the show online, watch it on dvr or downloaded the show, theres more ways to get the weekly shows now then in the 90's, In 90's you pretty much had to watch it live on tv or you wouldn't see it.

If things like watching shows online and dvrs where around in the 90's the ratings wouldn't have been as high as they where, They still would have been a lot higher then now but i really don't thing they would have pulled in the monster ratings they used to pull in back then.
__________________
11rob2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 09:03 PM   #8 (permalink)
Little Poppa Pump
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,169
Wrestling02370 Wrestling02370 Wrestling02370 Wrestling02370
Default Re: TNA is not stagnating, they are growing.

I think pro wrestling is definitely in a down slope. So naturally, the second largest company is going to fall behind WWE. Its comparing apples and oranges.

I think TNA may need to utilize a couple big names. Look at January 2010. They drew 3 million. Why? because some of the old faces were coming back. I'm not saying hire Nasty Boys or X Pac... but there is a market for a guy like Kevin Nash, Scott Steiner and Matt Hardy.
Wrestling02370 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 12:29 AM   #9 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Paradise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 615
Paradise is in rep purgatory
Default Re: TNA is not stagnating, they are growing.

Statistically, they are growing and what wrestling fans don't seem to understand is what TNA is drawing is considered good ratings. What WWE draws are elite ratings that rank up there with the NBA, NHL, MLB programming.

1.8 million viewers per week is better than 45% of Cable TV shows. 90% of Spike TV's shows for example draw a maximum of 900,000 viewers. MMA Uncensored draws 400,000 viewers, their highest peak was near 700,000 when Batista appeared. Yet, Spike was thrilled with those numbers.

If you are not FOX, ABC, USA, MTV, TNT or any of the elite channels on television, your product will not sustain 3-4 million viewers.

The issue that people should examine with TNA is why do they peak with viewership at 2.0 million or so but dip all the way down to 1.4 million. Why are these casual fans not buying into the product while the company continues to draw 1.4 million faithful viewers. What are the casuals seeing that the hardcore faithfuls do not?
Paradise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 02:52 AM   #10 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
hahawas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 859
hahawas hahawas
Default Re: TNA is not stagnating, they are growing.

I swear no one has Neilson boxes so how can anyone properly count?
__________________
What if WCW won the Monday Night Wars?

Here's what I think would have happened: http://inthesquaredcircle.blogspot.c...ight-wars.html
hahawas is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios