Why Samoa Joe? - Page 4 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, ROH, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 09-28-2012, 01:24 PM   #31 (permalink)
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
Skermac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,146
Skermac is being a bitchSkermac is being a bitch
Default Re: Why Samoa Joe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ErrybodyTaps View Post
Like I said in another thread yesterday I hope they move away from the weekly defenses. It became very monotonous and or redundant as we kept seeing the same guys going up against Devon.

Have it defended bi-monthly. Once on every PPV and once every Championship Thursday. If they want Championship Thursday to feel special and set it apart, then it would allow that show to always feature 2 title matches, the TV title and one other title match monthly. The other title match could be on rotation between the KO's, XD, Tag & World Titles. If you rotate them then each of those titles could be defended 3 times yearly on TV plus on PPV whilst the TV title would be defended 12 times a year on TV and on every PPV.


It's a TV title, defending it bi-monthly is way to long in between for a tv title. It's meant to be defended on tv. I would say no more than 2 weeks between defending the title and NEVER EVER EVER on a ppv. The tv title should only be defended on tv so everyone can see it. Not every one can get ppv's and even if they could the tv title still should not be defended on a ppv unless it's renamed. It's called TV title for a reason.
Skermac is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 09-28-2012, 01:26 PM   #32 (permalink)
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
Skermac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,146
Skermac is being a bitchSkermac is being a bitch
Default Re: Why Samoa Joe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeysnotright View Post
Thanks for the spoiler, dick!
I live on the West Coast.
On to the topic, Samoa Joe can bring some much needed prestige to the TV Title, as long as he puts on good to great matches, and has a lengthy title reign.


So the west coast doesn't see Impact live??
Skermac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 01:58 PM   #33 (permalink)
Little Poppa Pump
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,220
ErrybodyTaps 501 - 1000ErrybodyTaps 501 - 1000ErrybodyTaps 501 - 1000ErrybodyTaps 501 - 1000ErrybodyTaps 501 - 1000ErrybodyTaps 501 - 1000ErrybodyTaps 501 - 1000
Default Re: Why Samoa Joe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skermac View Post
It's a TV title, defending it bi-monthly is way to long in between for a tv title. It's meant to be defended on tv. I would say no more than 2 weeks between defending the title and NEVER EVER EVER on a ppv. The tv title should only be defended on tv so everyone can see it. Not every one can get ppv's and even if they could the tv title still should not be defended on a ppv unless it's renamed. It's called TV title for a reason.
WCW, ECW and ROH have never shied from defending the TV Title on PPV/iPPV. You watch PPV's on your TV (except in the case of ROH), therefore it is fitting to be defended on PPV as well as TV.

If they went with the fact that not everyone can watch a PPV, then why defend any title on PPV as normally fewer than 10k see the PPV's while a million watch the TV show. Putting that title on PPV means more reason to purchase if they can make that strap more prestigious. Also if it is only defended bi-monthly you are going to have fresher matches over that strap on both TV and PPV, which is more reason to tune in (or not switch the channel) or buy the PPV, you won't be getting stuff like Robbie vs Devon 38 times in a 6 week span.
__________________
http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/383915_10151049045736026_517033516_n.jpg

Last edited by ErrybodyTaps : 09-28-2012 at 02:04 PM.
ErrybodyTaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 02:10 PM   #34 (permalink)
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
Loudness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,298
Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500
Default Re: Why Samoa Joe?

It was a great decision, I can't even understand the thought process on why anybody would rather have Anderson as TV champion rather than Joe.
Loudness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 02:17 PM   #35 (permalink)
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Shazam!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 478
Shazam! 251 - 500Shazam! 251 - 500Shazam! 251 - 500Shazam! 251 - 500
Default Re: Why Samoa Joe?

I don't mind Samoa Joe as the new TV champ especially since I fully expect him to defend the belt against Magnus at Bound for Glory anyway's, besides it's better then Garrett Bischoff (who isn't ready) and Mr. Anderson (whose boring) holding the belt.
__________________
http://www.wrestlingforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic201700_5.gif
Shazam! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 02:18 PM   #36 (permalink)
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
Skermac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,146
Skermac is being a bitchSkermac is being a bitch
Default Re: Why Samoa Joe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ErrybodyTaps View Post
WCW, ECW and ROH have never shied from defending the TV Title on PPV/iPPV. You watch PPV's on your TV (except in the case of ROH), therefore it is fitting to be defended on PPV as well as TV.

If they went with the fact that not everyone can watch a PPV, then why defend any title on PPV as normally fewer than 10k see the PPV's while a million watch the TV show. Putting that title on PPV means more reason to purchase if they can make that strap more prestigious. Also if it is only defended bi-monthly you are going to have fresher matches over that strap on both TV and PPV, which is more reason to tune in (or not switch the channel) or buy the PPV, you won't be getting stuff like Robbie vs Devon 38 times in a 6 week span.


How about this idea, have him defend the title once every month or 2, but have non title matches every week or 2? A tv champ should wrestle on Impact a lot even if it's a non title match.

Plus non title matches are a great way to build up for a title match. For example you see someone beat the champ in a non title match but loses during the title match.

What do you think of having the title only change hands at a ppv, but everything else on Impact? I don't like that idea but some might.
Skermac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 02:34 PM   #37 (permalink)
WESLEY BROWN
 
Shepard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Geordie Shore House
Posts: 5,860
Shepard 31501 - 50000Shepard 31501 - 50000Shepard 31501 - 50000Shepard 31501 - 50000Shepard 31501 - 50000Shepard 31501 - 50000Shepard 31501 - 50000Shepard 31501 - 50000Shepard 31501 - 50000Shepard 31501 - 50000Shepard 31501 - 50000
Default Re: Why Samoa Joe?

Why not? Joe's had a great year and when he presumably drops it to Magnus it gives Magnus a nice rub. Plus seeing Joe wrestle every week is a bonus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skermac View Post
His fat ass will suck as tv champ. It should have been Anderson or Magnus. Joe is a good wrestler but little mic skills or personality. He's not the total package.
And Anderson is?
__________________

Shepard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 02:42 PM   #38 (permalink)
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
Loudness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,298
Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500Loudness 4001 - 4500
Default Re: Why Samoa Joe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shepard View Post
Why not? Joe's had a great year and when he presumably drops it to Magnus it gives Magnus a nice rub. Plus seeing Joe wrestle every week is a bonus.



And Anderson is?
This is just another good use of Joes run. I personally wouldn't mind if that feud wasn't overrushed and if Joe retains at first at BFG, Magnus winning without any buildup would feel empty and emotionless. However, sooner or later it should happen, I just want Magnus to be a regular Impact cast by that time, aswell as Joe putting on great matches week by week. When the time is right, and if enough effort gets put into it, I can see Joe/Magnus beeing the biggest midcard storyline in TNA, or one of the biggest at least.
Loudness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 03:30 PM   #39 (permalink)
Shooting the birds down from the trees
 
BULLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Salma Hayek.
Posts: 4,505
BULLY 17001 - 17500BULLY 17001 - 17500BULLY 17001 - 17500BULLY 17001 - 17500BULLY 17001 - 17500BULLY 17001 - 17500BULLY 17001 - 17500BULLY 17001 - 17500BULLY 17001 - 17500BULLY 17001 - 17500BULLY 17001 - 17500
Default Re: Why Samoa Joe?

Samoa Joe is great. I'm glad he's tv champion. If anybody can make the belt relevant, it's him.
__________________
BULLY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 07:57 PM   #40 (permalink)
Learning to break kayfabe
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 191
Rock&Austin 50 - 100Rock&Austin 50 - 100
Default Re: Why Samoa Joe?

I actually wanted Magnus to win the TV title simply because I think its a belt that shouldn't be held by main event guys like Joe and Andersen. It should be with a low-midcarder type of wrestler and Magnus was the perfect choice in my opinion.
Rock&Austin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios