Originally Posted by M.S.I.I.
There's a difference in chanting ECW and micro-analyzing storylines because of where one of the workers involved use to work. That's the point and nobody cares about that stuff.
Gallows is a decent worker, a good big man and fits the look of the stable they want.
you're right. And as far as i know, Gallows wasn't relevant in WWE so is not an established talent. He has to work his ass off to deserve a spotlight in TNA.
What i find most curious is that people say that nobody knows Gallows so he's irrelevant, but then again he was in wwe and people remember that?! wth?
And i still don't get all the fuzz about bringing someone that actually fits a storyline and could do a good job in TNA, just because he has been in wwe, like all the other wrestlers didn't been there either at some point...
Give the guy a break and let him do his work. You might be surprised.