Aces & Eights Discussion Thread - Page 224 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
View Poll Results: Leader of A&8?
Someone on the roster 102 27.49%
Someone brought up from development 25 6.74%
A familiar Impact Wrestling face 244 65.77%
Voters: 371. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #2231 of 4984 (permalink) Old 11-02-2012, 05:59 PM
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
 
alex1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 4,409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Aces & Eights Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rayfu View Post
I see nothing saying this, did he MAKE it to tough enough?
link? nothing on anything I've found says this.
Heres what I found

http://www.pwmania.com/austin-aries-...gh-enough-more

alex1997 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2232 of 4984 (permalink) Old 11-02-2012, 06:07 PM
Working on my abs
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: like a bitch
Posts: 2,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: Aces & Eights Discussion Thread

I dont count being told "no" being a WWE reject, while yes they "are" my reject meant they7 made it to wwe, and tNa makes them stars becuse they WHERE in WWE and nother else, at l;east thats how i feel.
Rayfu is offline  
post #2233 of 4984 (permalink) Old 11-02-2012, 06:07 PM
Working on my abs
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: like a bitch
Posts: 2,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: Aces & Eights Discussion Thread

I dont count being told "no" being a WWE reject, while yes they "are" my reject meant they7 made it to wwe, and tNa makes them stars becuse they WHERE in WWE and nother else, at l;east thats how i feel.
Rayfu is offline  
post #2234 of 4984 (permalink) Old 11-02-2012, 06:47 PM
April O'Neil is the GOAT
 
Parison Sapphire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 664
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: Aces & Eights Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by JaredStyles96 View Post
Wiki says they rejected him and he didn't make the cast. I never watched the show but wow, what a mistake.
They weren't a very good judge of wrestler potential, Maven and Adam Levine .

Parison Sapphire is offline  
post #2235 of 4984 (permalink) Old 11-02-2012, 06:51 PM
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
Brown Hippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,870
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
             
Re: Aces & Eights Discussion Thread

Bully Ray patched in Luke Gallos btw.

Brown Hippy is offline  
post #2236 of 4984 (permalink) Old 11-02-2012, 07:02 PM
Convinced Vince to make me a Main-Eventer
 
joeisgonnakillyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 10,060
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: Aces & Eights Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Power View Post
Also regarding "this reject crap" TNA had CM Punk under contract when everyone rated him highly in 2003 and did nothing with him. TNA also had Austin Aries under contract before and did nothing with him. If you want to label CM Punk as a TNA reject it says more about TNA's ability to spot talent and create stars than anyone.

CM Punk is the Steve Austin to TNA's WCW. They had him and they had no idea what to do with him and he left to do other things.
So you agree with me, just because a company is dumb enough to let someone go doesn't mean he's a "reject".

WWE could also have joe and aj styles, are they steve austin to WWE's WCW? I don't think so.
It's all subjective... wrestlers aren't promotion A or B property.



The reason why we don't get fresh ideas and promotions rising in American Pro Wrestling is because the majority of the community is happy with the same old shit and will reject any chance of change. There is a risk in doing new things, 9 times out of 10, it leads to 50+ pages of bitching and moaning. While business gets turned into a dictatorship and more and more out of touch. Support the indies, support New Pro Wrestling.
joeisgonnakillyou is offline  
post #2237 of 4984 (permalink) Old 11-02-2012, 08:06 PM
Working on my abs
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: like a bitch
Posts: 2,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: Aces & Eights Discussion Thread

I'm not saying they are, I've said it many times now pick stars form WWe is okay its when they put THOSE guys OVER guys becuse IMO they where WWE is what bugs me.
I dont mind if they have angle etc over, but you should not have as many of them compared to "your guys"
It's the only reasson those guys are in the main event and what not.
make more of their "own stars" as it where
Basccily i dont want to see hardy, angle, anderseron, and all the other WWE\WCW guys being on top always, make room for others.

Last edited by Rayfu; 11-02-2012 at 08:08 PM.
Rayfu is offline  
post #2238 of 4984 (permalink) Old 11-02-2012, 08:51 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 579
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
   
Re: Aces & Eights Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeisgonnakillyou View Post
So you agree with me, just because a company is dumb enough to let someone go doesn't mean he's a "reject".

WWE could also have joe and aj styles, are they steve austin to WWE's WCW? I don't think so.
It's all subjective... wrestlers aren't promotion A or B property.
If you are fired from your six figure salary by a company that grosses 10s of millions of dollars per year and runs several weekly arena shows and you signed for a smaller promotion who can no longer afford Velvet Sky and Alex Shlley, I'd say "reject" is the word I use. If you miss out on a young talent like CM Punk because you are have no eye for talent, then that makes it the companies fault, not the wrestler.
Diesel_Power is offline  
post #2239 of 4984 (permalink) Old 11-02-2012, 09:04 PM
Convinced Vince to make me a Main-Eventer
 
joeisgonnakillyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 10,060
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: Aces & Eights Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Power View Post
If you are fired from your six figure salary by a company that grosses 10s of millions of dollars per year and runs several weekly arena shows and you signed for a smaller promotion who can no longer afford Velvet Sky and Alex Shlley, I'd say "reject" is the word I use. If you miss out on a young talent like CM Punk because you are have no eye for talent, then that makes it the companies fault, not the wrestler.
TNA can't afford velvet sky and alex "shiley"? really?



The reason why we don't get fresh ideas and promotions rising in American Pro Wrestling is because the majority of the community is happy with the same old shit and will reject any chance of change. There is a risk in doing new things, 9 times out of 10, it leads to 50+ pages of bitching and moaning. While business gets turned into a dictatorship and more and more out of touch. Support the indies, support New Pro Wrestling.
joeisgonnakillyou is offline  
post #2240 of 4984 (permalink) Old 11-02-2012, 09:20 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 579
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
   
Re: Aces & Eights Discussion Thread

Not for the likes of Alex Shelley they can't. If you are at a certain level, prepare to be fucked. There are different scales of what TNA can afford. The pay scale in TNA is horrendous. The rich are very rich and the poor are very poor. The fact they allow Alex Shelley to leave and keep the likes of Rob Van Dam and Mr Anderson under contract says a lot about their talent relations department.
Diesel_Power is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome