[alex1997]

People complaining because the second guy revealed just happen to be a ex wwe wrestler and not a main eventer maybe the reasoning behind the group is that the maybe feel disrespected and want revenge

Seriously tho people give it some time till we know more members

[Rayfu]

We;ve been right so far, it looks like we know most of the memembers, can that chnage? sure, but as of now its WWE 0.5 and even if it is they are "disrespected" or what not I dont care, my problem is I dont want TNA to take WWE's old talent, becuse
#1 i want it to be its own
#2 they may take one WWE takes ofense to, if so TNA may be done for, if WWE REALLY wanted to tna would not be here, so why poke the bear?

[alex1997]

Originally Posted by Rayfu

We;ve been right so far, it looks like we know most of the memembers, can that chnage? sure, but as of now its WWE 0.5 and even if it is they are "disrespected" or what not I dont care, my problem is I dont want TNA to take WWE's old talent, becuse
#1 i want it to be its own
#2 they may take one WWE takes ofense to, if so TNA may be done for, if WWE REALLY wanted to tna would not be here, so why poke the bear?

What members can you confirm that hasnt been reveal they might just be using the ones you think you know as bodies we dont know

I get you want Tna to be it self thats fine and how could wwe take offense to tna signing a wrestler they release if they wanted a wrestler they wouldnt release him

[Carlito09]

Luke Gallows is a very good mid card guy with upside you kidding??. He is a monster and a power wrestler ......I like all the Ace and Aces guys who wrestle. When Gallows comes in you can feel the power .

Cant wait for the rest and to see who leader is.

[Rayfu]

Originally Posted by alex1997

What members can you confirm that hasnt been reveal they might just be using the ones you think you know as bodies we dont know

I get you want Tna to be it self thats fine and how could wwe take offense to tna signing a wrestler they release if they wanted a wrestler they wouldnt release him

Lets put it this way, we where right about gallows, and Devon seemd to be clear by many as well

Why? becuse the more they take the more threat they make?
amd for all we know WWE may lose someone they want, say Y2J if for some reasson they could not come to an aggrement, they may pick someone who "left" on their own terms.


Many Wrestlers have been relazed even when they WANT them, an exsample is when you spsuend someone three times, when you cant sign an aggrement, when he dont "work" with the rest well (but still a great talent them self)

[Ron Swanson]

A lot of trivial arguing over the members but in the end, they really need to strike it big on the leader for the story arc to have a pay off. Luke Gallows isnt going to make or break the story.

[alex1997]

Originally Posted by Rayfu

Lets put it this way, we where right about gallows, and Devon seemd to be clear by many as well

Why? becuse the more they take the more threat they make?
amd for all we know WWE may lose someone they want, say Y2J if for some reasson they could not come to an aggrement, they may pick someone who "left" on their own terms.


Many Wrestlers have been relazed even when they WANT them, an exsample is when you spsuend someone three times, when you cant sign an aggrement, when he dont "work" with the rest well (but still a great talent them self)

If wwe really wanted to keep someone who failed there drug policy three times they could.There was rumors going around that orton broke it but the let one side or made up an excuse for it so they could keep him

You think wwe would try and buy tna over one wrestler they couldnt come to terms with lol no wwe is a business they'd move on and spend the money on something else

Edit: Wwe does have an 90 day non compete clause so wrestler cant go straight to tna

[Rayfu]

Originally Posted by alex1997

If wwe really wanted to keep someone who failed there drug policy three times they could.There was rumors going around that orton broke it but the let one side or made up an excuse for it so they could keep him

You think wwe would try and buy tna over one wrestler they couldnt come to terms with lol no wwe is a business they'd move on and spend the money on something else

Edit: Wwe does have an 90 day non compete clause so wrestler cant go straight to tna

They COULD, but it dont mean they will, like matt hardy, or jeff, they could be super over, but sometimes WWE lets them go even when they WANT them, becuse they cant keep them with the way the guy accted, even then its still clear that WWE has let pepole go and then kept trying to get them back cause they wanted them


And the bold helps me, cause by your lgoic they would not care if the rejects went to tna, but they care enough to make where they dont join ANYONE for 3 months, so maybe, just maybe they sill care about them going to TNA?

[alex1997]

Originally Posted by Rayfu

They COULD, but it dont mean they will, like matt hardy, or jeff, they could be super over, but sometimes WWE lets them go even when they WANT them, becuse they cant keep them with the way the guy accted, even then its still clear that WWE has let pepole go and then kept trying to get them back cause they wanted them


And the bold helps me, cause by your lgoic they would not care if the rejects went to tna, but they care enough to make where they dont join ANYONE for 3 months, so maybe, just maybe they sill care about them going to TNA?

Not really sure what point your trying to make in the first paragraph so..

The 90 day compete clause is so if a wwe wrestler makes a big buzz over something and wants to leave the buzz dies down before he go's or so they have time to make a new deal with the wrestler because they actually want to keep him but had to release him for some reason

[Rayfu]

Originally Posted by alex1997

Not really sure what point your trying to make in the first paragraph so..

The 90 day compete clause is so if a wwe wrestler makes a big buzz over something and wants to leave the buzz dies down before he go's or so they have time to make a new deal with the wrestler because they actually want to keep him but had to release him for some reason

Your proven my in the first paragraph, you said they would not let go of someone if they did not want to, but now you just admit they can\have\have a plan for when this happens.


The point I'm making is
#1 WWE HAS let go guys they dont want to, for what ever reassons
#2 TNA is taking a lot of guys who where in WWE, this emans its possible they still have freinds there and can even "steal them" (notice all the big names came after sting really?)
#2 id they keep this up it MAY afeect WWE enough to be worried, if so tna will be buerid.