View Poll Results: Which Match Are you looking forward to the most?
|
|
Jeff Jarret vs Kurt Angle
|
 
|
61 |
51.69% |
|
Sting vs Somoa Joe
|
 
|
57 |
48.31% |
| Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
|
09-30-2008, 10:27 AM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
<3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Not Australia
Posts: 4,896
|
Re: Bound For Glory Discussion Thread
So in that case the fatel four way main event from the lastppv was a gimick match, rit?
__________________


credit- Shady
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
09-30-2008, 10:33 AM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
|
Second Best In ROH
Join Date: May 2006
Location: london
Posts: 1,239
|
Re: Which one Are you more looking Forward too??
For me there both just as good on paper, Joe vs Sting offers lots and Joe will get a great match from Sting. But the same could be said for Jeff vs Angle, the only difference here is if Mick is Guest Ref.
|
|
|
09-30-2008, 10:43 AM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
Jumping Off Roofs
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 263
|
Re: Bound For Glory Discussion Thread
This doesnt belong in this thread but I adress it and then move on, "Bunnymania" was NOT a gimmick match. A gimmick match is a match with stipulations. Different rules then a normal match. A different name doesnt make it a gimmick match. It was a Tag Team match and nothing else.
As for the card. It looks good, not great. Im not into the Sting Vs. Joe match at all. But should be good.
The Steel Asylum seems very pointless so far.
Things will probably be added the next couple of weeks so hard to tell how it will be. But overall it should be a really good PPV.
|
|
|
09-30-2008, 10:53 AM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
Asking Russo for advice
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sitting on a cornflake, waiting for the van to come
Posts: 1,839
|
Re: Which one Are you more looking Forward too??
Can't see either being classics but Angle generally puts on a good show come the big event, so Jarrett v Angle.
__________________
YOUNG MODERN
"You better watch your back"
|
|
|
09-30-2008, 11:48 AM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
Sit in the shadows. Observe, then chuckle...
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,849
|
Re: Which one Are you more looking Forward too??
It's about a year too late for Joe/Sting. They should of had it when Joe had the most momentum in the company a year or two ago. Regardless, I'm still looking forward to it based on the storyline they are in.
Jarrett/Angle spark my interest since it's a first time thing. Although I don't consider Jarrett a "top notch" star, I still consider the match to be pretty unique.
Actually, the BFG thread can be used.
__________________
Don't know where to go
Production is slow
Have life as a star
Contained in a jar
If I lay my head down on your knee
Pretend I'm your lover
|
|
|
09-30-2008, 11:51 AM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
|
Taz > Tazz
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,188
|
Re: Bound For Glory Discussion Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSoulTaker
So in that case the fatel four way main event from the lastppv was a gimick match, rit?
|
No, that's just a single pinfall match with 4 guys. And actually it ended up being a 3 way match, not a fatal four way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonLives
This doesnt belong in this thread but I adress it and then move on, "Bunnymania" was NOT a gimmick match. A gimmick match is a match with stipulations. Different rules then a normal match. A different name doesnt make it a gimmick match. It was a Tag Team match and nothing else.
As for the card. It looks good, not great. Im not into the Sting Vs. Joe match at all. But should be good.
The Steel Asylum seems very pointless so far.
Things will probably be added the next couple of weeks so hard to tell how it will be. But overall it should be a really good PPV.
|
My point was that if TNA ran something called "Bunnymania" or something similar, all the people that complain about TNA running too many gimmick matches would be classifying it as a gimmick match.
|
|
|
09-30-2008, 11:58 AM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 997
|
Re: Bound For Glory Discussion Thread
jarret/angle is the money match for me, though i expect joe/sting to be great as well
and like i said, hopefully no more clusterfuck sillyness announced for BFG
|
|
|
09-30-2008, 12:07 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
|
Taz > Tazz
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,188
|
Re: Bound For Glory Discussion Thread
Here's how I look at the 2 multiman matches. They were doing Fight For The Right which was a multiman match as well that was horrible and everyone hated, I'll gladly take the Steel Asylum over that any day.
Then they do Monsters Ball every year, just this year it's a tag team match instead. Has anyone seen the No DQ 6 man tag from Genesis 05? If this match can resemble that match in some way, it could be pretty awesome.
|
|
|
09-30-2008, 10:42 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 332
|
Re: Bound For Glory Discussion Thread
Wrestlemania had the Belfast Brawl, Money In The Bank, Bunnymania (I don't mind the name, but it WAS a lumberjack match), and a No-DQ (I don't count this as a gimmick).
So 3 gimmicks in Wrestlemania 24...
|
|
|
10-01-2008, 12:34 AM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
|
Kurt F'N Angle!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,705
|
Re: Bound For Glory Discussion Thread
Which was the NO Dq match at Mania 24?
They also had a triple threat at Mania aswell.
I'm hoping Cage/AJ/Booker have a match at BFG
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|