UPCOMING EVENTS HEADER 

WWE Wrestlemania XXVI
March 28, 2010
 
  TNA Destination X
March 21, 2010
 
WWE Elimination Chamber
February 21, 2010
 
  TNA Against All Odds
February 14, 2010
 
WWE Royal Rumble
January 31, 2010
 
  TNA Genesis
January 17, 2010
 
TNA Final Resolution
December 20, 2009
 
  WWE: TLC
December 13, 2009
 
Reply

Old 05-17-2008, 03:19 PM   #21 (permalink)
Wrestler's Rat
 
poison the well's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 750
poison the well 251 - 500poison the well 251 - 500poison the well 251 - 500
Default Re: Has-Beens and TNA.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Frye View Post
Yeah, this topic is ridiculous. Kurt Angle, Booker T and Scott Steiner haven't lost a step in the ring not to mention they are all good mic workers. Jeff Jarrett and BG James have been in TNA since the very beginning, and neither are anywhere close to the main event scene. Jarrett hasn't even appeared in over six months, and what did he do in his last match there? That's right, he put Robert Roode over. Just like Booker T's been doing. Kip James and Black Reign will never get past the midcard. Nash is Nash, he wrestles only when he feels like it. Sting has been a main eventer or semi-main eventer for over a decade. These guys (except Black Reign and Kip James) are useful assets for TNA.

Someone else already pointed out the advanced age of WWE's top guys already as well. Both of these companies don't focus much on the young guys and midcard, which is something that made the Attitude Era so special.
Proving my point that you are not a fan of TNA of old, but a fan of TNA of new. Both companies don't focus much on young guys? That's all TNA WAS before Sting hit the building, then the watergate broke loose on has-beens jumping ship. The funny thing about it is, TNA was doing as well ratings-wise without these guys as they are WITH them. Which also proves my point that they don't NEED to be doing this. They'd probably be even MORE successful now with what they were doing, which was establishing their own talent. You damn Noobie.

Those guys haven't lost a step. How long have you really watched those guys. Cause I watched the Steiner Bros back when they won the NWA tag titles from the Midnight express, and then had the belts renamed to the wcw world tag titles. I can tell you one thing, Steiner hasn't lost one step since then, he's lost about 10 steps.

Booker T never lost a step because he never had much of one. But he was 10x more entertaining in Harlem Heat than he ever was meant to be again. He cuts a solid promo. But great wrestler he is not. He was marketed well by WCW and that's why he became a successful singles wrestler. Anybody can be established if you market them correctly. I'm sure your a big WWE fan too, and I bet you love Cena and Batista. Well these guys a simply products of marketing a gimmick. All they are all they will be. Neither is a great wrestler, or even a good one. Booker is no different, SUCKA
__________________
Pope has spoken

Last edited by poison the well : 05-17-2008 at 03:22 PM.
poison the well is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 05-17-2008, 03:30 PM   #22 (permalink)
Virgil at Conventions
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 530
MDeJ 251 - 500MDeJ 251 - 500MDeJ 251 - 500MDeJ 251 - 500
Default Re: Has-Beens and TNA.

Kip James recently put over Matt Morgan.
Sting is hardly as 'has been'(you need to rethink your definition of that term by the way). The guy is a pro wrestling legend and his matches are very good. I particularly loved his title match with Kurt Angle. And a feud with champion Samoa Joe would is a must.

Now think back, think back real hard...three years ago...where was all the young talent that is on top of TNA right now? I'm talking about...

Robert Roode (a top heel for sure)
Gail Kim (top knockout wrestler and first knockout champion)
Samoa Joe (TNA heavy weight champion)
Jay Lethal (long time XDivision champion and very charismatic now days)
LAX (top tag team and current tag team champions again)
Awesome Kong, ODB, Beautiful People, (face it, TNA has the best roster of women wrestlers on tv now)
AJStyles & Tomko (top tag team and TNA has used Tomko millions way better than WWE ever used him)
James Storm (great wrestler and TNA is slowly pushing him)

Who did Kurt Angle go after when he came into TNA? That's right, one of TNA's young talents...Samoa Joe.

Who did Booker T feud with when he came into TNA? That's right, one of TNA's young heels Robert Roode.

Who has Sting put over in his current TNA tenure? Guys like Abyss, Christian, Kurt Angle, Christopher Daniels and James Storm.

You need to rethink things dude.
MDeJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 06:01 PM   #23 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 0
Judas Mesias 50 - 100
Default Re: Has-Beens and TNA.

Quote:
Originally Posted by -ShowStopper- View Post
Sting - 49
He's only going to be around for a bit longer and spends most of his time putting over other guys. TNA haven't built their company around him and his leaving won't have any major impact on them.

Kevin Nash - 48
He hardly even wrestles. His main power is in storylines and backstage stuff. His impact is mainly from the mic and age isn't a factor in that. He's supposedly putting Joe over later this year anyway.

Scott Steiner - 45
The guy can still go and is a genius on the mic. Again, he's hardly ever won in TNA and is mostly putting guys over.

Kip James - 44
Why he's mentioned I don't know.

Booker T - 43
Booker T is in TNA to help the young talent. He's already given Roode a big boost and rumour has it he'll be putting over Joe soon. Also, he's still awesome in the ring.

Jeff Jarrett - 41
Hasn't been on TV for an age. Again, why is he on the list?

Kurt Angle - 39
Angle is the only one who you could make a case against. However, TNA need someone to take them mainstream and Angle is the best for that job. He's the biggest name they have so having him on top is the smartest move.

Dustin Rhodes - 39
B.G. James - 38
Why are these two mentioned?

What you don't seem to understand is that the best way to get someone credible is to have them go over name guys. If you asked a casual WWE fan who'd never seen TNA who Joe was they'd shrug. If you then told them he's beaten some of those names listed above, they'd take him seriously and see him as credible. Names like Styles and Daniels won't impress new fans, and with a growing product, that's ultimately what they need. Look at what TNA is doing with the likes of Joe, Styles, Roode and even guys like Lethal and Kaz.
the whole story
Judas Mesias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 07:11 PM   #24 (permalink)
Wrestler's Rat
 
poison the well's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 750
poison the well 251 - 500poison the well 251 - 500poison the well 251 - 500
Default Re: Has-Beens and TNA.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD13 View Post
If it wasnt for the big names like Angle, then TNA wouldnt have anywere near their current level of succsess. Also just because a wretler has hit 40 doesnt mean that their talent & ability suddenly erodes over night. Back in the day, the large majority of maineventers were in there 40/50s or older.
They're current level of success is equivlent to their level of success before the big names made the jump. Making you incorrect.
__________________
Pope has spoken
poison the well is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 09:03 PM   #25 (permalink)
Working Dark Matches
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,026
Don Frye 2501 - 3000Don Frye 2501 - 3000Don Frye 2501 - 3000Don Frye 2501 - 3000Don Frye 2501 - 3000Don Frye 2501 - 3000Don Frye 2501 - 3000Don Frye 2501 - 3000Don Frye 2501 - 3000Don Frye 2501 - 3000Don Frye 2501 - 3000
Default Re: Has-Beens and TNA.

Quote:
Originally Posted by poison the well View Post
Proving my point that you are not a fan of TNA of old, but a fan of TNA of new.

Wait, you're whole point in this topic is that I didn't watch TNA before 2005? I thought your point was that old = suck.

Quote:
Originally Posted by poison the well View Post
The funny thing about it is, TNA was doing as well ratings-wise without these guys as they are WITH them.

That's not an indicator of what's wrong with TNA, that's an indicator of Spike TV once AGAIN failing to promote wrestling at any other times then when wrestling was actually on. Spike's promotion failures was a major reason that ECW died, a minor reason RAW's been dropping in the ratings over the years it was there. It's why RAW moved back to the USA network. TNA's gotten similar ratings as they did on Fox Sports Net. The thing is, the Russo tactics that may have worked for a quick ratings boost in 2000 don't work anymore.

Quote:
Originally Posted by poison the well View Post
Which also proves my point that they don't NEED to be doing this. They'd probably be even MORE successful now with what they were doing, which was establishing their own talent. You damn Noobie.

You're telling me nothing I don't already know. However, I have no influence backstage in TNA, so it's rather pointless to do so.

I joined this forum an entire year before you did and you're calling ME a n00b? Lmao, nice try imbecile.

Quote:
Originally Posted by poison the well View Post
Those guys haven't lost a step. How long have you really watched those guys. Cause I watched the Steiner Bros back when they won the NWA tag titles from the Midnight express, and then had the belts renamed to the wcw world tag titles. I can tell you one thing, Steiner hasn't lost one step since then, he's lost about 10 steps.

I've watched wrestling only since 2004, but I've gone back and watched my fair share of older stuff. Scotty Steiner never moved around much, back in the day he was a tag specialist so he only had to work half a match. Nowadays he moves just as slowly, but gets impressive results out of it? Did you watch Sacrifice? He WAS the main event. Joe continues to become softer and less interesting and Kazarian was just out of his league.

Quote:
Originally Posted by poison the well View Post
Booker T never lost a step because he never had much of one. But he was 10x more entertaining in Harlem Heat than he ever was meant to be again. He cuts a solid promo. But great wrestler he is not. He was marketed well by WCW and that's why he became a successful singles wrestler. Anybody can be established if you market them correctly.

A minute ago you were talking about Booker T as having lost steps in the ring and now you're going on about his entertainment value? It's like you can't decide what to make your argument about. Your arguments have more holes in them then a hanging chad. I take it that maybe you have forgotten that Booker T also wrestled TWO awesome best of 7 series against Chris Benoit. Booker can get down and dirty and wrestle. In your words, Booker became a good wrestler because he was marketed well? That's horseshit. Booker became a good wrestler because he learned how to wrestle. Ever since he's gotten to TNA, he's been all about putting people over as well. Robert Roode's been a real beneficiary of this attitude.

Quote:
Originally Posted by poison the well View Post
I'm sure your a big WWE fan too, and I bet you love Cena and Batista. Well these guys a simply products of marketing a gimmick. All they are all they will be. Neither is a great wrestler, or even a good one. Booker is no different, SUCKA

The old saying goes "assuming makes an ass out of you and me." That's only half true in this case. I have NEVER been a John Cena fan (I don't like rap at all and I think he's as generic as one can be in the ring). I marked for Batista one time, in 2005 when he turned on Triple H and put him through a table. That was in my dumb mark days, but still then I marked more because I hated Triple H than loved Batista. Booker T, however, is a good wrestler, a good but not great speaker, and hasn't diminished at all since leaving WWE. Now can you dig that?
__________________
Evenflow: Raven Megapost Updated 3-12-09

The Ultimate Chris Benoit Megapost Updated 3-10-10

Dangan: Masato Tanaka Megapost Updated 1-26-09

HEH?!: The Scott Steiner Collection Updated 5-29-09
Don Frye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 09:40 PM   #26 (permalink)
Forum Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 247
steiners 101 - 250steiners 101 - 250
Default Re: Has-Beens and TNA.

Quote:
Originally Posted by poison the well View Post
Booker T never lost a step because he never had much of one. But he was 10x more entertaining in Harlem Heat
Complety right....
steiners is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios