Summer Slam Winner:
Smackdown by 1/2 Star (Even if you added Roman vs Rusev, that shit wasn't even PPV worthy, and would have been a 0 star, so yeah, undisputed winner Smackdown)
Smackdown: 5 matches plus Main Event and 17 stars total
2 3/4
2
4 1/2
2 3/4
2
3
RAW: 5 matches plus Main Event and 16 1/2 stars total
2
2 3/4
2 3/4
2
4
3
According to Meltzer, RAW's 3/4 more stars between Womens title match as Smackdown's 6 woman tag, was equal to Smackdown's 12 man tag match over RAW's Tag title match. Now ain't that some bullshit. Smackdown's men's tag match was incredibly better than whatever you call what New Day did. That same difference is what he is saying the Womens title match has over Smackdown's womens tag match. There is no way the gap is that big. The stupidest part about it, that Womens title match led nowhere, while the 6 women tag match led to a double heel turn, and great action that week, so who is the real winner.
For a match with so many botches, I can't believe he would rate it anything above an average match of 2 1/2 stars. Based on this, he must start all matches with a 0 star, and only puts it up when something cool happens, cause clearly having no mistakes and having a great response and overall good match isn't worth an average showing of 2 1/2 stars, what is mind boggling, is that it is weaker than a match full of flaws only cause it had a few big spots, or, only cause it had Charlotte.
If every fan is like Melzter, all WWE has to do is just have everyone be spot monkeys. Cause hey, if they screw up and botch and injure each other so that 1 can't show up next day, as long as they have the 1-2 big spots, it is still above average and better than Smackdown's 6 women tag match.