Originally Posted by Champ
I simply facepalm'd at the amount of votes lee/aldridge got because both were all star worthy. he implied that stats and team records played the two biggest factors in determining all stars and I proved that they're both irrelevant. that's not childish, just exposed his point.
Thing is, as soon as he said they were not All Star worthy, you attacked Garnett, even though Notorious never even said anything about him. That's what I found childish. Forget the fact that they are in different conferences, so it's not like Garnett was picked over LMA or Lee, which does indeed make it irrelevent.
I agree that team stats and records should not determine All Stars though.