Basically, you have no valid argument on why LMA should have been picked or been higher, so you try to turn this into an insult the other person's team/player you're arguing with.
Not childish of you at all...
Looking forward to Bulls/Celtics tonight. Hopefully another win to keep us at pace with the top.
Not me, but hey that's what happens when you don't play defense, why do you think the Kings have been terrible for so long, that's why Mike Dantoni is a god awful coach.
But hey no complaints from me, i personally love Dantoni because he makes the Lakers terrible.
I simply facepalm'd at the amount of votes lee/aldridge got because both were all star worthy. he implied that stats and team records played the two biggest factors in determining all stars and I proved that they're both irrelevant. that's not childish, just exposed his point.
I simply facepalm'd at the amount of votes lee/aldridge got because both were all star worthy. he implied that stats and team records played the two biggest factors in determining all stars and I proved that they're both irrelevant. that's not childish, just exposed his point.
Thing is, as soon as he said they were not All Star worthy, you attacked Garnett, even though Notorious never even said anything about him. That's what I found childish. Forget the fact that they are in different conferences, so it's not like Garnett was picked over LMA or Lee, which does indeed make it irrelevent.
I agree that team stats and records should not determine All Stars though.
simple. because he's the second best power forward in basketball playing on a team with no bench.
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Wrestling Forum
23.4M posts
266.5K members
Since 2002
A forum community dedicated to all Wrestling enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about WWE, AEW, Ring of Honor, Impact and all forms of professional and amateur wrestling.