2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread - Page 54 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #531 of 970 (permalink) Old 11-18-2012, 12:00 AM
46 and 2
 
Hit-Girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: DO YOU THINK ME WICKED?
Posts: 11,298
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMister View Post
@LC: Tennessee lost too btw.



K State choked. There is no question. Oregon too. They lost to teams they probably should have beaten.

K State not only lost they got half a hundred hung on them by Baylor.
Tennessee losing brings me so much joy. I can't even put it into words right now. I just hope Dooley doesn't apply for the Kentucky job.

I wonder if they'll just cancel the Kentucky v. Tennessee game next week out of kindness.



-sig by CHAMPviaDQ

WE'RE THE BAD NEWS, WE'RE THE YOUNG GUNS, WE'RE THE ONES THAT THEY TOLD YOU TO RUN FROM.
Hit-Girl is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #532 of 970 (permalink) Old 11-18-2012, 12:01 AM
GOD
ITS NEW JACK THE ORIGINAL GANGSTA
 
GOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Twin Peaks
Posts: 8,119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

heartbreaking loss for my mountaineers, difference is our fucking dumbass of a kicker and the defense NEEDS to make more FUCKING stops


"We ain't gotta dream no more, man." - Stringer Bell
GOD is offline  
post #533 of 970 (permalink) Old 11-18-2012, 12:01 AM
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
BruiserKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,990
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

http://espn.go.com/ncf/conversations...ce-sources-say

Don't know if this would actually happen, but it would be huge for the bottom line for the Big Ten Network. Regardless of whether or not people watch, you'd be looking at 25 million sets of eyes in the DC or NYC metro areas alone that would have access to the BTN at its most basic packages. Whether people actually watch or not wouldn't matter, all the money comes from the fact the TV sets would be wired.

This would also be a big F-U to Notre Dame from the Big Ten. Notre Dame's deal with the ACC was one they wanted out of the Big Ten a few years ago. The B1G told them they had to be all in, including football. There is the chance the Big Ten could possibly go after some of the other ACC schools, like Pitt and possibly Virginia or Duke? Notre Dame dropped their Michigan series earlier this year effective after 2014, so could the Big Ten teams that still schedule them follow suit and dump the Irish first?

Meanwhile, looks like Notre Dame, barring a choke job against USC that might be without Barkley vs. an SEC team. I hate Notre Dame, but don't know if I can stomach another SEC national title.



The original heel commentators

Last edited by BruiserKC; 11-18-2012 at 12:05 AM.
BruiserKC is offline  
post #534 of 970 (permalink) Old 11-18-2012, 12:02 AM
GET MY BAGS
 
HeatWave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The Hall
Posts: 9,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glass Shatters View Post
Yeah, kind of like how Auburn can have an average or shitty team and play Alabama tough in the Iron Bowl regardless of record like they did in 2009? Or like Stanford did USC in 2007? The fact you would even discount rivalry games and the attitude brought into it makes me question your football acumen. Football is not simply about talent.
Didn't discount rivalry games, but you did discount a better team...
HeatWave is offline  
post #535 of 970 (permalink) Old 11-18-2012, 12:06 AM
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,197
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeatWave View Post
Didn't discount rivalry games, but you did discount a better team...
I'm not even going to dignify this with a response acknowledging what the comment entailed.

ATTN: We are now looking at possibly having 3 of the top 5 teams in college football from one conference with the outside likelihood of two of them playing for the title again. Said conference is obviously "overrated" according to some.

Notre Dame, Alabama, Georgia, Oregon, Florida.

Last edited by Glass Shatters; 11-18-2012 at 12:09 AM.
Glass Shatters is offline  
post #536 of 970 (permalink) Old 11-18-2012, 12:12 AM Thread Starter
P.O.P., hold it down
 
Earl the Red Nosed Reindeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 21,487
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

You guys have been arguing about this for like 3 days lol.

Y'all should give it up, you won't come to an agreement.

As far as my take on the situation goes, I feel like every other conference has been terrible this year for the most part so it makes the SEC this year look better than it actually is, if that makes sense.

Earl the Red Nosed Reindeer is offline  
post #537 of 970 (permalink) Old 11-18-2012, 12:15 AM
...
 
MrMister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Book of Love
Posts: 28,314
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

How can we have two of them playing for the title? One SEC team will have two losses after the SEC title game.

ND is guaranteed to only have 1 loss.

MrMister is online now  
post #538 of 970 (permalink) Old 11-18-2012, 12:17 AM
GET MY BAGS
 
HeatWave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The Hall
Posts: 9,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMister View Post
How can we have two of them playing for the title? One SEC team will have two losses after the SEC title game.

ND is guaranteed to only have 1 loss.
Florida wins vs FSU then they move up in top 2 & ND moves out
HeatWave is offline  
post #539 of 970 (permalink) Old 11-18-2012, 12:19 AM
46 and 2
 
Hit-Girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: DO YOU THINK ME WICKED?
Posts: 11,298
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

Florida is NOT getting in the national championship game.



-sig by CHAMPviaDQ

WE'RE THE BAD NEWS, WE'RE THE YOUNG GUNS, WE'RE THE ONES THAT THEY TOLD YOU TO RUN FROM.
Hit-Girl is online now  
post #540 of 970 (permalink) Old 11-18-2012, 12:20 AM
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
BruiserKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,990
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Notorious View Post
You guys have been arguing about this for like 3 days lol.

Y'all should give it up, you won't come to an agreement.

As far as my take on the situation goes, I feel like every other conference has been terrible this year for the most part so it makes the SEC this year look better than it actually is, if that makes sense.
The Big Ten resembles that remark, I'm a Big Ten apologist but I know they've sucked all forms of ass this year. When the two best teams are ineligible for postseason and we could be seeing Nebraska vs. Indiana for the Big Ten championship, it's a down year.



The original heel commentators
BruiserKC is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome