2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread - Page 19 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #181 of 970 (permalink) Old 09-15-2012, 11:23 PM
...
 
MrMister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Book of Love
Posts: 28,269
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

SC upset. I never understood people's love of this team before the season. I didn't think they'd get beat by Stanford though.

MrMister is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #182 of 970 (permalink) Old 09-15-2012, 11:25 PM
Working on my abs
 
Joel Anthony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: EVERY EVENING, I HAVE A BY MYSELF MEETING
Posts: 2,598
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

All we need is a couple more teams to fall and there's a chance that everyone gets back in the loop. The targets mainly on 'Bama.. if they lose, fagetta about it... prolly get another 1 loss vs 1 loss Nat'l Championship. And yeah I just did not understand the USC love.

Joel Anthony is offline  
post #183 of 970 (permalink) Old 09-15-2012, 11:25 PM
Vince gives me a comedy gimmick
 
Perfect Poster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

This offense makes me want to punch babies. Maxwell looks clueless, the OLine blows, and Roushar sucks at gameplanning. It's one thing to lose, but not putting up a fucking TD is just pathetic. Lot of work to do. Just lucky that it doesn't count as a conference loss.



Perfect Poster is offline  
post #184 of 970 (permalink) Old 09-15-2012, 11:45 PM Thread Starter
P.O.P., hold it down
 
Earl the Red Nosed Reindeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 21,466
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

Goodnight Ole Miss...

Earl the Red Nosed Reindeer is offline  
post #185 of 970 (permalink) Old 09-15-2012, 11:50 PM
Working on my abs
 
Joel Anthony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: EVERY EVENING, I HAVE A BY MYSELF MEETING
Posts: 2,598
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

That Holy War is looking pretty good on the Deuce.

Joel Anthony is offline  
post #186 of 970 (permalink) Old 09-16-2012, 12:23 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Psycho Sid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: 4243'43.2"N 8429'05.3"W
Posts: 630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfect Poster View Post
This offense makes me want to punch babies. Maxwell looks clueless, the OLine blows, and Roushar sucks at gameplanning. It's one thing to lose, but not putting up a fucking TD is just pathetic. Lot of work to do. Just lucky that it doesn't count as a conference loss.
Maxwell sucks, he isn't showing any improvement. It's going to be a long season if we can't throw the ball.

Psycho Sid is offline  
post #187 of 970 (permalink) Old 09-16-2012, 01:12 AM
Vince gives me a comedy gimmick
 
Perfect Poster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

I'd put more blame on the O-line letting him get pressured all game and some of the receivers dropping catchable balls and not making plays for him. Fowler dropped a sure TD early on and that really could've gave them momentum. Mumphries looks like the best WR of the bunch but they have all these weapons (Lippet, Fowler, AJ Sims, Burbidge, Arnett, Langford even if I believe he's listed as a RB) and someone needs to have some big play ability like Keyshawn was for us last year. And Le'Veon needs more than 19 carries. I know the game kinda dictated that we needed to pass as it was going on, but early on in the 3rd even it seemed like he wasn't getting as many looks as he should've been. No, he doesn't need 50 touches again. However, if it takes 35 touches, so be it. He's our best offensive player by far and we got another de facto bye week against EMU next week.

I'd save from placing the blame on Maxwell. They had a shitty gameplan (one deep shot to Fowler in the EZ and that was about it for taking chances early on) and the O-line was bad and banged up (Fontoni was out and I believe Jack Adams wasn't playing either due to health. We had some 4 year ST lineman at LG iirc). Not trying to make excuses for him, but the line had trouble containing 4 and 5 man pressure for more than a second or two. When you can put 7 or 8 guys in the secondary to clog up 3 or 4 passing lanes it's gonna be tough. I still thought he looked better today in comparison to the Boise game (where he had clear first game jitters and was way too overexcited) and frankly if they get the running game going again (and a healthy OLine) he doesn't have to be what Cousins was. I'm perfectly fine with him managing the game. The D only needs about 20-24 points a game to win convincingly.

tl;dr it was more O-line and Roushars fault than Maxwell for that offensive atrocity tonight.



Perfect Poster is offline  
post #188 of 970 (permalink) Old 09-16-2012, 01:32 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Psycho Sid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: 4243'43.2"N 8429'05.3"W
Posts: 630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

There is definitely plenty of blame to go around after tonight's dismal offensive performance. Maxwell needs to stop staring down his receivers and go through his progressions. He seems to have his mind made up where he wants to throw the ball and either tries to force it in or get sacked waiting for his man to get open. It would help if the o-line could give him some more time though. Lippet is also very disappointing. He almost cost us the Boise game and didn't do anything tonight. I really want to see Arnett get more than 2 plays a game so we can see what he can do. I hope they figure something out next week or we will be in trouble against OSU in the B1G Ten opener.

Psycho Sid is offline  
post #189 of 970 (permalink) Old 09-16-2012, 01:59 AM
I used to be jealous of Arron Afflalo
 
Brye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 23,189
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

at those dumbass Utah fans. Wish BYU hit the field goal to teach them a lesson.



Sig: ABrown & CHAMP

Panthers - Red Sox - Nuggets

WWE Layeth The Smacketh Down
Brye is offline  
post #190 of 970 (permalink) Old 09-16-2012, 08:22 AM
Working on my abs
 
TomahawkJock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mizzou Tiger Country
Posts: 2,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: 2012-13 College Football Discussion Thread

Man, the SEC East may be the most competitive "conference" in all of College Football this year.

TomahawkJock is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome