How is 1.8%=4%?
Manning had 16 INTs, Brees had 11(once again, can you not fucking do simple math, you seriously can't minus 11 from 16?
),but Manning had 1 fumble compared to Brees having NINE.
Manning also had SEVEN 4th quarter comebacks. SEVEN. He lead us back from games that could have easily been losses. And no, he wasn't the reason we were down in the first place, in most cases it was our awful defense which would give up points far too often.
Your arguments are pathetic and you do bad comparsions when trying to prove your arguments. My more wins thing did not get obliterated, you're just a ***** and don't know shit.
also, not all INTs are due to the QB being at fault. I recall a lot of those INTs from 2009 being caused by tipped balls from our receivers not getting their hands completely on the ball. I can't really prove this, but if you actually watched the games you would know this. Once again, there was an obvious reason why the voters voted for Manning over Brees. Just let it go. The voting wasn't even close in fact, Manning got 40 out of the 50 votes.