so you're telling me they didn't have a good defense or respectable runningbacks when he took over? And how the fuck is 6-10 even comparable to 2-14? You realize there's a huge difference in 4 wins, right? I think it's time for you to go if you're actually saying that Big Ben took over a team that was as the Colts were.
Wut? They were suppose to be rebuilding. They were suppose to be worse than the year prior that year. You realize they won 15 games right? 15 GAMES! With a QB that was suppose to be 3rd string. There's also a big difference between at best 12 wins and 15 wins. I don't care which team was suppose to be worse. What he did is miraculous. I don't really care who is "better". Ben can keep winning and you guys can keep listing QBs you think are better. Doesn't much matter.
Statistically he was bad and statistically I assume the worst numbers for a superbowl winning QB but he did make two plays which the win completely depended on. 3rd and 28 and the ankle tackle after THE BUS fumbled.
It's not hard to list QBs that are better than Big Ben because there are plenty. Superbowls are a team accomplishment more than a individuals accomplishment. So are wins, but Luck is the reason we're winning and there's absolutely no doubt about it because we're still pretty bad all across the board.
Not really. I will disagree because I think you're wrong. People hate on him for stupid reasons. The guy was having an MVP caliber season this year but he's still meh to a lot of people. I really don't care. I can name NFL QBs better than him. There's really not many I'd rather have though. For a number of reasons.