Terry was caught on tape saying it. Suarez case was based mostly on the word of Evra and a few others. Not saying Suarez is innocent but its amusing to see you condemn him while at the same time sucking off Terry. The only reason he got off was because it was in court. If the Suarez case was in court he would've got off as well. FA should've handled it, and banned Terry at the time.
No. Suarez admitted he said the term. And then we had everyone from his camp and some Uruguayan players rushing to say it is not an offensive word. Which was researched and proved a load of bollocks. His story also changed a lot of times as the 100+ page document showed. I condemn Suarez because he was proved guilty. Why is that wrong?
Terry now has always maintained he repeated the word and not directed it at Anton. Is it true? I don't know because the evidence is not there to prove either way. So he's not guilty. So why should I condemn him?
Again, it went to court because the incident was first spotted by someone who isn't even part of football, who then sent a complaint to the police.
It's ridiculous that you think if Suarez is guilty, Terry must be too when it's different cases.
Edit: In other news, AVB is still moaning about Chelsea
Ok, so since his appointment we have found out that:
- There is more warmth at Spurs than Chelsea
- He played his part in the two trophies we won (which is true, had he not got sacked, we would not have won them)
- Roman quit on him, not he was doing a poor job
- Promises were broken
- Levy is more committed than Roman
- He must have been crying since we won the CL, because his voice sounds terrible!