[Medo]

Southampton, why why ?

[Kiz]

i guess they always say the best just find a way to win. very ordinary performance but 3 points is 3 points.

hart - nothing mch to do, could do nothing about the goals
clichy - stellar i thought. lots of crucial tackles and good attacks
kompany. good
lescott - shaky
zaba - poor. didn't contribute much to attack or defence
rodwell - played well. one mistake cost him dearly, otherwise settled in well
yaya - created lots, not much came off, got the assist to dzeko
silva - very poor. looked totally off his game from the beginning
nasri - very good. looked fresh, some great passes and of course the goal
tevez - workhorse. battled for everything and stepped up without aguero
dzeko - eh. should've finished some, but scored the 2nd. meh.

[BANKSY]

Rodgers could really be feeling the pressure with Pools next games against City/Arsenal.

[alex1997]

Very unconvining performance by city but as said above 3 points is 3 points at the end of the day

[Gambit]

Originally Posted by Lil'Jimmy

Rodgers could really be feeling the pressure with Pools next games against City/Arsenal.

If we lose both of those games (which I think we will) I expect people to start to get on his back.

[BANKSY]

Originally Posted by R.K.O Peep

If we lose both of those games (which I think we will) I expect people to start to get on his back.

Hodgson 2.0

Souness chants echoing round Anfield.

[Gambit]

Originally Posted by Lil'Jimmy

Hodgson 2.0

Souness chants echoing round Anfield.

Difference is Rodgers may do a good job and we might play some good stuff. Woy was going to make us a midtable club and we played shocking football under him. Should never have hired him in the first place. Hopefully people are patient with Rodgers. Saying that though we do need to play better then we did yesterday. Losing 3-0 to west brom is not good enough

[Razor King]

I'll comment on our match first and we looked the same Arsenal from 2009: just flat and dull. Last season, we didn't look this flat. Cazorla was 10x better than all of our other players, but Gervinho was also very good. Podolski didn't even get to touch the ball and missed a goal that vP would have scored. Giroud didn't look all that much. Why the heck did Wenger persist with Walcott? He was terrible. And, why the heck did he bring Ramsey on? Also, why didn't he just go with a 4-4-2 with both Poldi and Giroud in the final stages? Damn...

Terrible This type of playing won't get us top-4; let alone challenging.

On the Chelsea game, one word: boring.

On City's game, one word: amazing. I hope Kun isn't out for long. That'd suck. Tevez was first-class. Nasri was immense and it's his best performance in a City shirt; MOTM for me.

On United, better hope they drop points.

Originally Posted by just1988

Looks like it could be some really bad news for City and Aguero, that may be what swings the title race. That being said Tevez is a more than adequate striker and could probably carry the load by himself.

Also, thought I'd share some facebook idiocy with you all. Here's a comment from a lad I went to school with, he's a United fan and it came a few minutes after City scored their 3rd and pulled the game around...

"joe hart injured for country! but now e fit al ov a sudden! wat a joke"

I love how his resentment for City has built to the level where even things that don't make sense become reasons to take shots at them. I wonder if he realises England won that game without him.

Well, Tevez is world class and he has carried City before, so it's not a big deal for him. But City will miss Kun badly at some point. Knowing them, they'd just go and buy Cavani or Higuain.

[T-C]

@Razor King - How lovely a player is Cazorla? He can do it all, what position was he in? Behind the striker?

[Joel]

Originally Posted by Razor King

Terrible This type of playing won't get us top-4; let alone challenging.

You'd think we were 14 games into the season, not one