 |
|
01-23-2013, 05:21 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,317
|
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?
What CM Punk is doing to the WWE Championship is what you call burying. It has been buried in prestige and importance in the last 14 months.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
01-23-2013, 05:50 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
|
Pulling my hair out until Game of Thrones season four
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Westeros
Posts: 64,375
|
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_IC_Champ
How the hell is he burying Sandow? Rhodes Scholars come out to Sandow's theme, and he does most of the talking. And the reason Rhodes is overshadowed is because WWE Creative hasn't given him a good gimmick.
|
No, the reason he's overshadowed is because Sandow is 5000x more entertaining than him. I guarantee you if you put Sandow in Cody's role and Cody in Sandow's, Sandow will STILL be the better half because Cody doesn't have his level of charisma, presence or mic skills. But back to the point...
So using his theme and him talking is more important than Cody getting ALL of the wins and Sandow taking ALL of the losses, and looking like the worse half of the team? What kind of BS is this?
And by the way, for the first half they were together, they used Cody's theme ANYWAY, so who cares? They're just alternating.
__________________
Last edited by Tyrion Lannister : 01-23-2013 at 05:53 PM.
|
|
|
01-23-2013, 06:38 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 532
|
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?
How are they burying the Rhodes Scholars? Their match at RR has gotten more build over the last several weeks, than the actual Rumble match itself. Not to mention the fact that they are more than likley going to win the tag belts from hell no(one of the most over acts in wwe).
__________________
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 04:43 AM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 113
|
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_IC_Champ
Did you even read my post?
|
Yes i did read your lousy post
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_IC_Champ
And some of the stuff you said isn't even accurate, like the #30 thing, because, if you watched Raw, Ziggler is either first or second.
|
The #30 and #27 was examples. I was telling you why A beat the clock challenge was relevant in this episode. I did not mention the result of the Raw show, at any time. Maybe you should read my post?
And; Some stuff isn't even accurate. Thats plural, though you only mentioned 1 thing - which you got wrong
__________________
"turned heel on the iwc"
My Favorites:
Legends: Sting, Hogan, Ric Flair, Randy Savage, and Undertaker
Classics: Goldberg, Kevin Nash, Shawn Michaels, Lex Luger
WWE: Christian, Daniel Bryan, Randy Orton, Damien Sandow, Cesaro
TNA: Austin Aries, Bully Ray, Magnus, Jeff Hardy
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:12 AM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
|
Getting over in the mid-card
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,909
|
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?
Sandow should split with the generic heel jobber 222 Cody Rhodes.
Sandow has been involved in segments with DX and Rock in his career.Shows WWE is high on him
__________________
Stone Cold on CM Punk's epic promo-CMPunk just melted my 52 inch TV with a scorching hot
promo...delivery, content, and attitude...one of
the best promos I've ever seen.
Hulk Hogan on CM Punk-I think CM PUNK has stepped up and proved he can hold his own with anybody in the ring and anybody on the mic,he's on a roll. HH
My favourite wrestlers:
1.Stone Cold Steve Austin
2.HHH
3.CM Punk
4.Brock Lesnar
5.The Rock
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 08:07 AM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 190
|
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrior
I think they are pretty much set to win the tag titles. I wouldn't worry too much.
|
That's how it seemed with the Prime Time Players, and look how that one turned out
Even though Rhodes Scholars are 1000* a better tag team and individual wrestlers than the PTP's.
Hell No are just too big at the moment, which is why they will retain at the rumble. They get huge reactions and are a massive draw for the tag team division.
This will be Rhodes Scholars 4th title opportunity. If they were going to put the titles on them, they would have done it by now. Hell No will be champs until at least Wrestlemania, I would bet money on it.
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 09:01 AM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?
I'd bet on them winning the tag titles at the Rumble so if giving them the titles is considered burying them well.. . ...
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 09:07 AM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
|
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,895
|
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?
I would prefer to think that Rhodes is holding Sandow back. Damien is a boss, and Cody is a legends son.
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 04:13 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 129
|
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrion Lannister
No, the reason he's overshadowed is because Sandow is 5000x more entertaining than him. I guarantee you if you put Sandow in Cody's role and Cody in Sandow's, Sandow will STILL be the better half because Cody doesn't have his level of charisma, presence or mic skills. But back to the point...
So using his theme and him talking is more important than Cody getting ALL of the wins and Sandow taking ALL of the losses, and looking like the worse half of the team? What kind of BS is this?
And by the way, for the first half they were together, they used Cody's theme ANYWAY, so who cares? They're just alternating.
|
There's no point in dragging this argument too far, but Sandow hasn't even taken all the losses anyaway. Rhodes might have won more matches than Sandow, but only by a few. Oh, and Cody does have that charisma. It was visible back in his Dashing and Undashing days.
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 04:32 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
|
|
Pulling my hair out until Game of Thrones season four
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Westeros
Posts: 64,375
|
Re: WTF is it with WWE burying Rhodes Scholars?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_IC_Champ
There's no point in dragging this argument too far, but Sandow hasn't even taken all the losses anyaway. Rhodes might have won more matches than Sandow, but only by a few. Oh, and Cody does have that charisma. It was visible back in his Dashing and Undashing days.
|
Not by a few, by a lot. Every time I see them, it's either Rhodes winning or Sandow losing.
As for Cody's charisma, not completely nonexistant, but minimal. Not apparent during either persona, ESPECIALLY UnDashing. When he was UnDashing, he cut the worst promos in the entire company, until they started letting him act like himself again. Cody is the textbook example of the generic, run of the mill CAW wrestler. He is not bad at anything, he is not good at anything, he just...is. His mic work is very average, his charisma is very average, his ring work is very average, and his look is very average.
__________________
Last edited by Tyrion Lannister : 01-24-2013 at 04:36 PM.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|