Re: Who Should Be The One To Go Face When Team Rhodes Scholars Split?
Personally, I don't like the idea of splitting up teams. What's wrong with a member of a team holding a singles title? They should remain a team, there is no rule that says that a team cannot participate in singles competitions seriously. Would it not be a better option for them to remain a team but go off and do their singles things?
It'd add more to their singles feuds and give them something to do when they aren't in the spotlight whilst giving the tag division a solid reputable team. The whole idea of splitting up teams before the team actually makes it anywhere has not worked out for any team. The most successful has been Miz-Morrison and it only sorta worked out for Miz.
__________________
3 x WFC - UNITED STATES CHAMPION
1x - WFC Tag Team Champion w/ Airtroublein619(New_Trouble)
Re: Who Should Be The One To Go Face When Team Rhodes Scholars Split?
Quote:
Originally Posted by new_guy
Personally, I don't like the idea of splitting up teams. What's wrong with a member of a team holding a singles title? They should remain a team, there is no rule that says that a team cannot participate in singles competitions seriously. Would it not be a better option for them to remain a team but go off and do their singles things?
It'd add more to their singles feuds and give them something to do when they aren't in the spotlight whilst giving the tag division a solid reputable team. The whole idea of splitting up teams before the team actually makes it anywhere has not worked out for any team. The most successful has been Miz-Morrison and it only sorta worked out for Miz.
Well the issue is if they do the singles stuff and someone wins a title, you have that imbalance in the team. The idea put forward is one is better than the other, so unless the team's about to implode, there's no point doing that.
Re: Who Should Be The One To Go Face When Team Rhodes Scholars Split?
I don't want them to split up because it will lead to a feud. That will lead to one losing the feud and ultimately, losing credibility. That's why this tag team was a bad idea to start with..
Re: Who Should Be The One To Go Face When Team Rhodes Scholars Split?
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF352
Not trying to start anything but why the fuck are you commenting on my threads? You basically tell everyone im a shitty poster so why comment on my threads if im so bad son?
Do I? That's funny because I have absolutely no idea who you are. The thread is about two wrestlers I'm interested in, so I threw in my two cents. Problem?
Re: Who Should Be The One To Go Face When Team Rhodes Scholars Split?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleDeckerBar
Do I? That's funny because I have absolutely no idea who you are. The thread is about two wrestlers I'm interested in, so I threw in my two cents. Problem?
Nope no problem at all but remember the am i the only that thinks wade isn't ready to be world champion thread? Yea thats the thread you were being an asshole on.
Re: Who Should Be The One To Go Face When Team Rhodes Scholars Split?
You can’t be serious OP, Sandow gimmick is strictly 100% Heel material but it wouldn’t surprise me if he can pull off a good Face as well just targeting against villains because the man is so talented. Cody Rhodes can pull off a good Face in my opinion, just bring back “Dashing” Cody Rhodes and you got yourself a good mid-card babyface after Kofi Kingston.
Who Should Be The One To Go Face When Team Rhodes Scholars Split?
Re: Who Should Be The One To Go Face When Team Rhodes Scholars Split?
