The problem with pushing someone, is it's one of the 3 or more main events at WM. And if they take someone like say, Ted Dibiase(insert anyone not at the top of the roster here), less people will be interested, and they won't look like they're as much of a threat to the streak, as say, the current WWE champ, or a well known powerhouse. Maybe if Taker was younger, and could put on a longer buildup, it might be possible to build someone up to it. But sadly, those days are past.
__________________
Call Kenny Loggins. Cause you're in the Danger Zone.
Royal Rumble is not good enough, he needs a WRESTLEMANIA main event. You don't just spit in your best performers face like this, by giving him midcard matches on the years biggest show after he's carried your main title for over a year, it's insulting.
Cena has been handed enough, he doesn't need his win back. What makes it better? If you saw Rock/Cena 1, you'd know what a piece of shit match it was and wouldn't need to ask the question. I don't EVER want to see these two in the ring with each other ever fucking again.
well there always Punk vs Cena vs The Rock triple threat main event if they want put him there. I find it very nauseating to see another Punk?Cena triple threat match (I could care less if the 3rd person here is Dwayne) and too be honest they need to be away from each other for a long while.
Pulling my hair out until Game of Thrones season four
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Westeros
Posts: 64,384
Re: Undertaker's Wrestlemania opponent
Quote:
Originally Posted by JY57
well there always Punk vs Cena vs The Rock triple threat main event if they want put him there. I find it very nauseating to see another Punk?Cena triple threat match (I could care less if the 3rd person here is Dwayne) and too be honest they need to be away from each other for a long while.
Then who the fuck faces Undertaker? Ryback? Sheamus? LOL.
It's not going to be a triple threat, and to be perfectly honest, it's also insulting to make it a triple threat. Why does Cena just HAVE to be in the match? Punk deserves the spotlight of a 1 on 1 match with Rock at Mania in the main event, not looking like he's only there because Cena is.
But, it is preferable to a midcard match with Undertaker which is what we're getting. Joy, won't that be exciting.
I think we know it's Punk. Cena is facing Rock and Triple H is facing Lesnar, so that's all that's left. Needless to say, I do NOT want this match, Punk needs the main event with Rock, but as usual, they forcefeed him something completely uninteresting in the midcard.
The only thing Punk deserves is getting squashed Daniel Bryan style in the opening match in under 18 seconds. Really hope they don't give him the main event spotlight or even a match with Undertaker. The Miz main eventing WM was bad enough (nothing against him, he's just not main event material), we don't need this vanilla hack ruining its prestige completely. Doing it to the WWE Championship was more than enough.
If he,s not going to face one of the huge superstars id rather have him face barret then sheamus,orton or big show. It could make a great storyline and would put wade over big.
Then who the fuck faces Undertaker? Ryback? Sheamus? LOL.
It's not going to be a triple threat, and to be perfectly honest, it's also insulting to make it a triple threat. Why does Cena just HAVE to be in the match? Punk deserves the spotlight of a 1 on 1 match with Rock at Mania in the main event, not looking like he's only there because Cena is.
But, it is preferable to a midcard match with Undertaker which is what we're getting. Joy, won't that be exciting.
That would imply that Punk would get a rematch that Cena wouldn't, which will never happen.
Both got a match against the Rock, both lost (Punk is losing at the Rumble most likely), so a Triple Threat match would actually be fitting for the occasion.
__________________
--- "Somewhere deep down there's a decent man in me, he just can't be found."
---
Pulling my hair out until Game of Thrones season four
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Westeros
Posts: 64,384
Re: Undertaker's Wrestlemania opponent
Quote:
Originally Posted by kopitelewis
Well, thanks for a 6 second clip from a movie nobody's ever heard of, but unfortunately, it doesn't change the fact that Undertaker vs Punk isn't appealing, or it being a midcard match, which anything that's NOT the last match on the card is.
Quote:
That would imply that Punk would get a rematch that Cena wouldn't, which will never happen.
Both got a match against the Rock, both lost (Punk is losing at the Rumble most likely), so a Triple Threat match would actually be fitting for the occasion.
No, it wouldn't be fitting. Cena lost for nothing. The fuck does he deserve a rematch for? It was one match, it was booked as FIRST AND ONLY TIME EVER!, and he lost, the end. Punk is losing a WWE title match in which he is contractually obligated to a rematch. Not to mention, Cena lost nearly a year ago, it's over.
Regardless, even if it is fitting, which it's not, it only serves to insult Punk by throwing Cena in there and making him look bad because WWE didn't let him have Rock 1 on 1 at Mania like they did for Cena.
__________________
Last edited by Tyrion Lannister : 12-07-2012 at 07:26 PM.
If anyone should challenge for the undefeated streak next year, it's Brock Lesnar for sure, he's easily the best option right now. He injured both Shawn Michaels and Triple H, two of Undertaker's last WrestleMania opponents, so he would pose a massive threat to the steak, and is credible enough. They've had some epic matches in the past together and this would be no different, especially on the grandest stage of them all. I understand there may have been some legitimate beef between these two (and possibly still is too), but that's really no big deal and no reason to prevent this match from happening. If Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels, as well as Edge with Matt Hardy, could work well together despite their real life heat, then I'm positively sure these two can likewise.
Undertaker's Wrestlemania opponent
Re: Undertaker's Wrestlemania opponent
