 |
|
10-20-2012, 01:36 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face.
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Propaganda Department
Posts: 3,200
|
Re: Is Smackdown more important from WWE's point of view?
How do you come to that conclusion?
The top guys are not only on Raw but also on Raw's House Shows and Smackdown is taped.
How can the taped show on a network with less viewership capabilities be more important than the live show on a more wide reaching network?
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
10-20-2012, 01:52 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Even Better Than The Beatles
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,525
|
Re: Is Smackdown more important from WWE's point of view?
Half of Smackdown is a RAW recap and John Cena appears on it in person once a century. There's your answer.
__________________
blog
"If I don't like it, I don't like it,
That don't mean that I'm hatin'."
- Common
Bryan. Punk. Ambrose. Reigns. Rollins. Ryback.
Jericho. Foley. Austin. Michaels. The Rock.
Wrestling fan since '96.
|
|
|
|
|
10-20-2012, 02:51 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Working on my abs
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,661
|
Re: Is Smackdown more important from WWE's point of view?
With just read the name of the thread made me hard to click on it. ..answer your question OP: No it isn't.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelly Kelly fan
CM Punk could legit beat anyone up all that training hes had in different martial arts my god that guy is dangerous dont fuck with him
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelly Kelly fan
Lol Teddy Hart beat up CM Punk how is that possible??? CM Punk is trained in a shit load of martial arts he can take down anyone
|
Hey idiots, are you still Fandangoing?
http://www.wrestlingforum.com/raw/76...ly-8th-uk.html
|
|
|
|
|
10-20-2012, 02:52 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: middle earth
Posts: 1,879
|
Re: Is Smackdown more important from WWE's point of view?
then why do they replay half of raw on smackdown op
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-20-2012, 03:06 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
1905. 1921. 1922. 1933. 1954. 2010. 2012.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: At AT&T Park at Third and King in San Francisco, watching the franchise with 66 representatives in the Major League Baseball Hall of Fame, 11 more than any other baseball team.
Posts: 10,150
|
Re: Is Smackdown more important from WWE's point of view?
I don't think WWE view it as more important than Raw, certainly not. Raw is definitely where they pour most of their efforts and concern, led chiefly by Vince McMahon himself.
However, Smackdown is important. It's important because it's often where WWE experiments with certain talents, where some bolder storylines take place (it's been a little while, though) and where certain guys get to become stars (Daniel Bryan, and to an extent Ryback was "prepped" on Smackdown before jumping over to Raw in the summer... ditto Damien Sandow, Antonio Cesaro, etceteras...) and it's important because it is a cash cow, annually generating an average of $150-200 million dollars for Vince McMahon.
Raw is significantly bigger, but that isn't to say the Smackdown part of the WWE business is unimportant, because it absolutely is not.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-20-2012, 03:21 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Humbled
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,791
|
Re: Is Smackdown more important from WWE's point of view?
SmackDown is sitting in the corner, bleeding to death. Terrible show.
|
|
|
|
|
10-20-2012, 03:27 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Cairo,Egypt
Posts: 3,490
|
Re: Is Smackdown more important from WWE's point of view?
RAW is WWE's #1 Show while Smackdown is WWE's #2 Show,This is fact OP.
__________________
|
|
|
|
10-20-2012, 04:09 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Little Jiminy Cricket
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,684
|
Re: Is Smackdown more important from WWE's point of view?
wow, I really ruined a lot of people's days by asking this question. So, thanks for the answers.
|
|
|
|
|
10-20-2012, 05:08 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: I'M FROM WINNIPEG, YOU IDIOT!
Posts: 3,379
|
Re: Is Smackdown more important from WWE's point of view?
No.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-20-2012, 08:18 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,430
|
Re: Is Smackdown more important from WWE's point of view?
Heck, I'd go as far to say that not only is Smackdown not as important as RAW, it's not important at all. Like if the canceled Smackdown tomorrow they'd lose absolutely nothing from a creative standpoint. The show is that bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Is Smackdown more important from WWE's point of view?
