I could see them breaking up after a DB and Kane feud. Just dont see team Hell No losing the titles so early in their run. Dont know how long the feud would go for.
__________________ WWE
CM Punk/Daniel Bryan/Sheamus/Heel Henry/Antonio Cesaro/Ziggler/Kaitlyn
TNA
Roode/Styles/Pope/Bully Ray/Dbl A/ Brutus Magnus
How and the hell do you think we can miss you come out here with your bright ass purple shirt, before that bright green shirt, bright orange shirt like a big fat bowl of Fruity Pebbles. - DwaIyne" The Rock" Johnson
The only thing thats real is me, and the fact that day in and day out for almost 6 years ive proved to everybody in the world. That i am the best. on this microphone,in that ring, even at commentary, nobody can touch me!- CM Punk
Kane and Bryan really aren't that bigger deals, Rhodes and Sandow beat them individually last week.
... With the help of outside interference. Kane was about to Chokeslam Sandow and Bryan was about to put the No Lock on Rhodes. Without the outside interference Kane and Bryan would've gotten routine wins.
Anyway, the gap between Rhodes/Sandow and Kane/Bryan is a lot closer than the gap between Rhodes/Sandow and The Uso's, they're literally bottom of the barrel JOBBERS. The Uso's job all the time on flaming NXT to developmental guys.
Based on their careers so far it goes...
Kane
Bryan
Rhodes
Sandow
Uso's
__________________
Sound the alarm. There's poop in this chair.
Say what? Eh?
Last edited by DoubleDeckerBar : 09-28-2012 at 01:24 PM.
No. This whole "Who is the HBK and who is the Jannety" argument needs to stop, both are talented young superstars that will have big roles to play in the companys future.
Anyway, Matthews said on Smackdown that he talked to Rhodes and Sandow before the show and they acknowledged that they weren't a "real tag team" so the whole one guy will become great while the other is doomed for failure won't happen with these two anyway.
I didn't like them coming out to Rhodes music though, with a name like "Rhodes Scholars" Sandow's music would've been more appropriate, although that's probably just my blind bias as I like Sandow more.
The Uso's got FAR too much offence in that match by the way, it should have been a straight up squash.
Rhodes is the more established plus his theme music packs more of a punch. WWE made the right decision. I remember their attack on Bryan and Kane on RAW and Sandow's music played. Didn't work as well as it would have if it were Rhodes'. Nothing to do with the two superstars themselves but theme-wise, Rhodes' is the way to go if they pick one or the other.
I could see them breaking up after a DB and Kane feud. Just dont see team Hell No losing the titles so early in their run. Dont know how long the feud would go for.
Don't think they'll lose the belts yet, Rhodes and Sandow are filler as they're both not doing much ATM.
Sandow will be main eventing soon (with the help of HHH) and Rhodes won't be far behind, thats why I'm saying people shouldn't be too worried out them i n this team together. Just enjoy it, they're very entertaining together,
I could see them breaking up after a DB and Kane feud. Just dont see team Hell No losing the titles so early in their run. Dont know how long the feud would go for.
I think it will only be HIAC and the RAW after it. Even though there is only 3 weeks from HIAC to SS. Really depends on what they plan for SS (have a title match or include tag teams in those 5 on 5 battles)
if they do I think Rey & Cara vs Kane & Bryan at SS.
Why do they have to put Sandow and Rhodes into a team?
I don't like it. These guys are singles superstars. This tag team run could ruin one of them. What was wrong with PTP, Mysterio/Cara, and the other tag teams?
Re: Why do they have to put Sandow and Rhodes into a team?
I hope and pray it's only temporary. Not that I dislike them as a team, but they're better off on their own. Really, I think it's a combination of WWE building their tag team division by using proper talent, and gaining heat by facing Kane and Daniel Bryan.
Re: Why do they have to put Sandow and Rhodes into a team?
Only reason I like it is because it gives Rhodes something to do, who had been stuck in no-man's land since losing the IC title. Otherwise I agree, they're both better off as singles competitors, especially Sandow, who has been on a nice roll recently.
It's only after you've lost everything that you're free to do anything.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,757
Re: Why do they have to put Sandow and Rhodes into a team?
Probably because both have nothing to do right now and they want to feature them both. Great way to do so in putting them in a team in a newly revived tag team division.
Team Rhodes Scholars
Re: Newly formed tag team.
GTA V! 
