I like Drew, hate Mahal and I'am starting to like Slater who I used to hate.
They will be dominant for 3~5 weeks and then disappear without any explanation what so ever
__________________ CM PUNK DANIEL BRYAN CHIRS JERICHO DOLPH ZIGGLER ANTONIO CESARO CHRISTIAN BRAD MADDOX WADE BARRETT CODY RHODES TYSON KIDD ZACK RYDER BROCK LESNAR TRIPLE H THE UNDERTAKER THE ROCK DEAN AMBROSE SETH ROLLINS
AUSTIN ARIES AJ STYLES BOBBY ROODE BULLY RAY JAMES STORM KURT ANGLE SAMOA JOE JOSEPH PARK CHRISTOPHER DANIELS KAZARIAN
DAVEY RICHARDS EDDIE EDAWARDS ADAM COLE JAY BRISCOE MARK BRISCOE RODERICK STRONG SAMI CALLIHAN
I'd put money down that instead of it being a new stable, it's Vince's way of beefing up these three jobbers before he feeds them all at the same time to Ryback.
I'll just quote myself from the other thread, since there are two:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zankman Jack
Classic ignorant and narrow-minded fools, "hating" on McIntyre, and even the idea of this new group.
I don't like nor Slater nor Jinder Mahal, but I see their qualities and their faults, just like I see Drew's.
My point: I can be fair with my words.
With all of that said, the whole attack and (obvious) selling of it being a stable-ish attack, was very surprising and interesting. I hope something good develops from it, things like this always have good potential.
I don't really want Barrett involved. He needs to be a powerful singles competitor.
The group of these three should be lead by McIntyre, IMO, but I have no issue with Slater being the leader.
Possible members: Hunico (and Camacho), McGillicuty, Curtis and Hawkins.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elstro1988
Really, really enjoyed this week's Superstars. Honestly, the fans who are too snobbish to watch it, dismissing it as 'Jobberstars' really miss out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Extra-
This post really makes you too smart for a '12er, doesn't it? Your new join date is 2008.
I'll just quote myself from the other thread, since there are two:
You can be fair with your words, yet you call people "ignorant and narrow-minded fools" for hating on McIntrye. I get that some people will base their opinion on Drew's IC title run, and that's not fair, but plenty of us have seen his more recent work and still dislike him.
You can be fair with your words, yet you call people "ignorant and narrow-minded fools" for hating on McIntrye. I get that some people will base their opinion on Drew's IC title run, and that's not fair, but plenty of us have seen his more recent work and still dislike him.
Some people? The problem is (and it's the only reason I even wrote what I did) that MOST people act like that.
The fact that it is Drew is irrelevant - thinking and "observing" things with such a closed-mind and narrow field of view is what a huge amount of people on this forum do.
They also think that it is fun to come off as a douchebag in every single one of their posts.
===
I see nothing wrong with your post. If you've seen the Drew (in this case) of the past and the present, and still don't like him, fine, that's your opinion.
I'm never against opinions, but I'm always against people being unfair with the way they present and express them.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elstro1988
Really, really enjoyed this week's Superstars. Honestly, the fans who are too snobbish to watch it, dismissing it as 'Jobberstars' really miss out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Extra-
This post really makes you too smart for a '12er, doesn't it? Your new join date is 2008.
good, I like mahal and slater's kinda funny so im OK with this.
but this idea you guys have about puttin barrett in the group is a bad idea, he should be holding one of the world titles or atleast be a main eventer, not be put in a group again.
A New Stable?
Re: [SPOILER] A New Stable?
