 |
|
09-11-2012, 10:04 PM
|
#71 (permalink)
|
|
Little Poppa Pump
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,075
|
Re: Smackdown 9/14/12 Spoilers + WWE SMS/Superstars Results
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrior
I don't even know why Sheamus needs a submission finisher in the first place. But Sheamus is the most pushed person this year so it wasn't surprising to me that even a heel submission specialist tapped to Sheamus. Just goes to show you what is in store for most of Sheamu's opponents.
|
He doesnt. This is probably part of his character development and to keep Smackdown interesting because they are desperate. The problem is severe lack of starpower to elevate these world champions by providing them main event threat. Sheamus has been beating guys that are beneath him, just like punk. If Sheamus is over-pushed, punk is just as over-pushed. Hell atleast punk main evented 3 PPVs, Sheamus absolutely none, they even outright acknowledged that he is secondary champion. Its not going to matter if he pins or makes them tap out, he's going no where until he gets that one big win over heel Orton, because thats the only way.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
09-11-2012, 10:08 PM
|
#72 (permalink)
|
|
Drafted to Monday Night RAW
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,684
|
Re: Smackdown 9/14/12 Spoilers + WWE SMS/Superstars Results
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vyed
He doesnt. This is probably part of his character development and to keep Smackdown interesting because they are desperate. The problem is severe lack of starpower to elevate these world champions by providing them main event threats to their titles. Sheamus has been beating guys that are beneath him, just like punk. If Sheamus is over-pushed, punk is just as over-pushed. Hell atleast punk main evented 3 PPVs, Sheamus absolutely none, they even outright acknowledged that he is secondary champion. Its not going to matter if he pins or makes them tap out, he's going no where until he gets the one big win over heel Orton because thats the only way.
|
The lack of star power is a problem, but making new credible stars wouldn't hurt either. I guess that is why CM Punk turned heel. They have teased Sheamus vs CM Punk and haven't done it yet.
__________________
The New Brothers of Destruction
|
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012, 10:23 PM
|
#73 (permalink)
|
|
Passing the Popcorn
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Snoth's Cave
Posts: 1,277
|
Re: Smackdown 9/14/12 Spoilers + WWE SMS/Superstars Results
Bryan taps to Sheamus? 
__________________
ChampviaDQ
|
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012, 10:28 PM
|
#74 (permalink)
|
|
They Call Him...Paco
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,598
|
Re: Smackdown 9/14/12 Spoilers + WWE SMS/Superstars Results
Sheamus submitting Bryan? No Sandow or Wade?I guess I'm okay with missing this Smackdown.
__________________
Fan of Daniel Bryan, Kazuchika Okada, and Tetsuya Naito
CREDIT TO "Tenacious.C. "
|
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012, 10:49 PM
|
#75 (permalink)
|
|
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,035
|
Re: Smackdown 9/14/12 Spoilers + WWE SMS/Superstars Results
shit...Sheamus over Bryan again?
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012, 10:57 PM
|
#76 (permalink)
|
|
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,247
|
Re: Smackdown 9/14/12 Spoilers + WWE SMS/Superstars Results
Jobbin' Danny B, enhancement talent and career JTTS.
__________________
I do have one question for anyone who might feel that Dwayne Johnson "owes" the business. Is it just him, or is it anyone who moved on to other things? Should Luna Vachon get heat for running a towing company instead of working on RAW? Should Maven be critiqued on his Home Shopping Network bits instead of wrestling?
Or is it only the ones who go on to highly visible careers in movies that owe something? Why do Johnson (who left after putting people over, doing the traditionally "right thing") and Lesnar (who did not; except for making Eddie a legitimate star) get called sell-outs who "forgot where they came from" when someone who retires to do some regular job get credit (as they should) for moving on and making it without falling into a sea of addiction?
|
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012, 10:57 PM
|
#77 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,308
|
Re: Smackdown 9/14/12 Spoilers + WWE SMS/Superstars Results
Bryan tapping out to anyone is bullshit.
__________________
CM PUNK MARKS : MORE VULNERABLE THAN 6 YEAR OLDS
I mark for : The Ryback, Meltzer, NIÑO HAMBURGUESA, College Girl, FACTOIDS 
|
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012, 10:59 PM
|
#78 (permalink)
|
|
Carrying SCOTT STEINER's bags
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Preston
Posts: 3,883
|
Re: Smackdown 9/14/12 Spoilers + WWE SMS/Superstars Results
This really does seem like a bare SD episode. Can understand why guys like Sandow and Barrett weren't on seeing as they are not on the Night of Champions card.
Glad to see Rhodes getting used more though. A month back it was depressing how little he was used and now his feud with Cara has done enough for WWE officials to push them into matches they didn't need to be part of, which is a good sign imo. And one of the few highlights of RAW (for obvious reasons) was Cody beating Mysterio and attacking Miz making a statement about wanting the IC title back.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012, 10:59 PM
|
#79 (permalink)
|
|
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,820
|
Re: Smackdown 9/14/12 Spoilers + WWE SMS/Superstars Results
No Sandow or Barrett is just outrageous.
__________________
20
|
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012, 11:26 PM
|
#80 (permalink)
|
|
Moron
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 222
|
Re: Smackdown 9/14/12 Spoilers + WWE SMS/Superstars Results
What a boring bunch of episodes these will be, glad to see a ry of tv, i guess wwe realised he injured mcintyre that prick
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Smackdown 9/14/12 + WWE SMS/Superstars Results
