 |
|
07-01-2008, 07:15 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Misses hearing "Armando Alejandro Estrada...haha."
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 545
|
Re: so triple h feud with undertaker pretty much confirmed *spoilers*
I can't see the Edge/Triple H/Undertaker fueds lasting until Wrestlemania. It's not that they wouldn't be able to keep it interesting for that long, because they could probably manage it, but I imagine they'd want to give Undertaker something different for Wrestlemania rather than continuing his streak with a triple threat win against two people he's already beaten. And he won't lose if it's a triple threat because it'd be a pathetic end to the streak. If he was going to lose, it'd have to be in a singles match, otherwise whoever beats him wouldn't get the same kind of rub from it.
The Edge/Undertaker fued is going to have to have one match left in it, but I'm thinking they'll go with a Triple H/Edge match where Undertaker screws Edge, then follow it up with one final Edge/Undertaker match, then go ahead with a Triple H/Undertaker fued until at least Survivor Series. I'm expecting that, by Wrestlemania, they'll either end up with Edge or Triple H fighting for the title, if not against each other, while Undertaker does something different.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
07-01-2008, 08:00 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Jumping Off Roofs
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 256
|
Re: so triple h feud with undertaker pretty much confirmed *spoilers*
He is rumored to stop the Wedding. So I think this fued will last to Summer Slam at least.
|
|
|
07-01-2008, 08:12 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: England
Posts: 3,100
|
Re: so triple h feud with undertaker pretty much confirmed *spoilers*
Use spoiler tags, also how is it confirmed? Edge will probably feud with Triple H.
|
|
|
07-01-2008, 08:21 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
-LOST-
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 3,347
|
Re: so triple h feud with undertaker pretty much confirmed *spoilers*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lashley™
Use spoiler tags, also how is it confirmed? Edge will probably feud with Triple H.
|
What exactly does he need to use spoilers tags for, their is no spoilers its just his opinion or him guessing
__________________
Save Us

|
|
|
07-01-2008, 08:26 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
WF's Metroid Nerd
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Coventry, UK
Posts: 1,628
|
Re: so triple h feud with undertaker pretty much confirmed *spoilers*
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Enigma_Mjuww
What exactly does he need to use spoilers tags for, their is no spoilers its just his opinion or him guessing
|
So him saying -
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashley678
well cm punk just got the belt from edge on raw
|
Is not a spoiler?
|
|
|
07-01-2008, 08:37 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
-LOST-
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 3,347
|
Re: so triple h feud with undertaker pretty much confirmed *spoilers*
Quote:
Originally Posted by b00ned
So him saying -
Is not a spoiler?
|
If he hasnt seen Raw and didnt want it to be spoiled he shouldnt have come on a Wrestling Forum, although he seemed to be posting in the Raw discussion thread last night after Punk won and has Punk holding the title in sig. and the title of the thread says "*spoilers*".
Also after the show is over they are no longer spoilers.
__________________
Save Us

Last edited by -TheEnigma- : 07-01-2008 at 08:40 AM.
|
|
|
07-01-2008, 09:17 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
WF's Metroid Nerd
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Coventry, UK
Posts: 1,628
|
Re: so triple h feud with undertaker pretty much confirmed *spoilers*
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Enigma_Mjuww
If he hasnt seen Raw and didnt want it to be spoiled he shouldnt have come on a Wrestling Forum, although he seemed to be posting in the Raw discussion thread last night after Punk won and has Punk holding the title in sig. and the title of the thread says "*spoilers*".
Also after the show is over they are no longer spoilers.
|
So if I did not stay up untill 4am watching it, and taped it to watch later instead, it's my own fault for being on a wrestling forum and venturing into topics that havnt been spoiler marked?
The thread title never said spoilers originally, hence the spoiler bitching.
Just because I have a job, and cant stay up all night watching wrestling doesnt mean I shouldnt be on here.
Spoilers are always spoilers to someone who hasnt seen it. Threads that contain spoilers should be spoiler marked untill at least a day afterwards.
|
|
|
07-01-2008, 11:36 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Ride With The Tide, Go With The Flow
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 704
|
Re: so triple h feud with undertaker pretty much confirmed *spoilers*
I don't see how Edge losing the title means Taker v Trips. I think it's the opposite.
I mean now Edge isn't a champion anymore, it means he and Taker can pick up their feud without the title being involved. I also like it when two main eventers feud over some personal vendetta, and with what has happened in the past between these two, there is plenty of material there to build a great feud, possible all the way to Summerslam for an epic finally.
As for Triple H, the draft has given him plenty of options to keep him busy defending the title. Umaga, MVP, Kennedy, Hardy... loads of guys for him to defend (or maybe drop) the title with.
__________________
|
|
|
07-01-2008, 11:54 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Wrestling On Heat
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 3,572
|
Re: so triple h feud with undertaker pretty much confirmed *spoilers*
Undertaker holding the spinner belt would be hilarious.
|
|
|
07-01-2008, 02:20 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 70
|
Re: so triple h feud with undertaker pretty much confirmed *spoilers*
Quote:
Originally Posted by petho89
I can't see the Edge/Triple H/Undertaker fueds lasting until Wrestlemania. It's not that they wouldn't be able to keep it interesting for that long, because they could probably manage it, but I imagine they'd want to give Undertaker something different for Wrestlemania rather than continuing his streak with a triple threat win against two people he's already beaten. And he won't lose if it's a triple threat because it'd be a pathetic end to the streak. If he was going to lose, it'd have to be in a singles match, otherwise whoever beats him wouldn't get the same kind of rub from it.
The Edge/Undertaker fued is going to have to have one match left in it, but I'm thinking they'll go with a Triple H/Edge match where Undertaker screws Edge, then follow it up with one final Edge/Undertaker match, then go ahead with a Triple H/Undertaker fued until at least Survivor Series. I'm expecting that, by Wrestlemania, they'll either end up with Edge or Triple H fighting for the title, if not against each other, while Undertaker does something different.
|
completely agree 
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|