Thread Tools

**Titania** · 05-14-2008, 06:28 PM

Seems that creative is trying to make Taker a super face with the way he's currently been treated. I'd like for him to be drafted to RAW so he can finish his illustrious career on the "A" show and take the WWE title away from Triple H.

JoseBxNYC · 05-14-2008, 06:30 PM

Triple H will not be happy with Undertaker on RAW. He knows he'll be out cheered for sure.

**Titania** · 05-14-2008, 06:35 PM

^He should do what's best for the company and recognize that the Undertaker deserves to leave the company on top considering all his contributions and loyalty to the WWE. If Taker goes to RAW, we'd get to see fresh feuds and possibly an epic feud between him and Trips.

**Mochan** · 05-14-2008, 06:44 PM

What the fuck? If Vince is that dumb to GRANT Triple H his wishes not to have Taker on RAW just cause he'll be out cheered, then its dumb as hell.

Do what's BEST for the business, not for some politic son of a ----- that wants everything to himself.

rcwilson17 · 05-14-2008, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjuww

How has a story about Edge, Undertaker and Vince McMahon turned into a Triple H hate thread

I know right like what the fuck. You gotta have alot of time on your hands to seriously find different ways to hate on HHH just let teh shit go already. Like HHH is rly gonna give a shit about something thats going on in Smackdown. He isnt on that brand has no reason to worry about it so like what the hell. The HHH hate is seriously getting stupid beyond belief. So what if HHH don't want to go on Smackdown he prob isn't the only one. Hell actually he isn't Batista bashed Smackdown in an interview and said he liked Raw better. Taker has been on Smackdown forever but I don't see anyone saying oh he doesn't wanna be on Raw. I never saw anybody bash Booker when he said he liked Smackdown much more than Raw. Or when Lashley got himself moved from Smackdown. People have their reasons so just accept that and stop bashing people for what they may want to do.

hardyboyz#1fan · 05-14-2008, 09:12 PM

taker should have stayed champ and either batista should have won battle royal edge doesn't deserve it he would earn it!

Aim111 · 05-15-2008, 06:07 AM

As I said somewhere on here before, I remember reading that Taker was not wanting to be working as much as someone with the belt would be. I thought that was one of the reasons why he wasn't the champion. It said that he wanted to spend time with his wife and kids and on the new business ventures that he's gotten into and that he didn't want to be on the road so much and have to be on tv so often. And with the last injury he had more time to put into his life away from wrestling and wanted more of that.

I don't know, who knows what is true when you read stuff like that...but it kinda makes sense. He's not 25 any longer, he's got a life away from the ring, he doesn't really NEED the belt although he certainly is entitled to it....to help his career along and he's got the streak, something that NO one else has. Maybe he doesn't care about being the champion for a long reign, maybe he's the one calling the shots on this? I have always heard that Taker has quite a bit of power back stage as well and perhaps he's the one saying that he doesn't want to have to be in the ring every week. He might be the one saying that he wants all of this to happen. Don't know, just looking at it from a different angle.

HLOTN · 05-15-2008, 08:42 AM

Whether Taker wins the title back or not, it was an interesting angle either way. It wasn't pointless to strip him of the title, only to have him win it back anyway. It's called storyline progression. Undertaker vs Edge was a little dry, but it's more interesting now.

As for all the Triple H comments, it continues to baffle me. He used politics to end Orton's reign? Now I'm not what you would call a HHH fan but he didn't win at Mania did he? Thats a sign - whether Trips wanted it or not - that Vince does give others an opportunity. Triple H is a fresh choice as champion. He's probably the second marketable guy on the Raw roster behind Cena, so it only makes sense to give him a run with the belt. It's not as if he's the same mundane character he was in 2003 when he was on top of Raw undeservedly. And he's put over a ton of guys since 2004. All of the HHH bashers did indeed have an argument in 2003, but it's too outdated and it's time to move on. I doubt he's squeaky clean, but then I don't think a lot of the top guys are.

And Taker does have his fair share of power. I thought everybody knew that. I'm sure if Taker was married to Stephanie, he'd get the level of bashing. In fact, anyone would because it's the sure fire easy target.

**Chelseafan** · 05-15-2008, 08:51 AM

Lol another bash HHH thread.
Keep it up with some ridiculous commments.

Undertaker needs to stay on SD,if he was to move to Raw it would be completely fucked.

JoseBxNYC · 05-15-2008, 12:43 PM

If Undertaker doesn't get the title back I wouldn't complain. If Edge wins it back and let's say Jericho and Jeff Hardy move to Smackdown. The title scene could get interesting. Undertaker doesn't need the title to make a feud great. Imagine if we get Undertaker v. Umaga. That would be a great feud and since is with Undertaker a World Title isn't needed to make it great. Not to mention a feud like the one I'm mentioning will help Umaga big time. I would really like Undertaker to take the HBK shedule. He's getting old and I would like to see him wrestle more time. He's a 6-Time World Champion and he's 16-0 at Wrestlemania. Not to mention no other superstar has beaten many different opponents like Undertaker has. He has beaten all the greatest. He doesn't need the World Title.

If Edge wins the title, then a little roster change is necessary. I don't want Batista near the title anymore. Chris Jericho feuding with Edge for the World Title would be awesome or Jeff Hardy since his push seems to be intact after his suspension.