Originally Posted by boozeco2005
Del Rio is an ok WHC. Even though he gets absolutely no heat or pop when he comes out, he is a serviceable heel champion. RVD is the one I have a problem with. I know this will probably ruffle the feathers of some RVD loyalists but it's just the way I see it. He is terrible on the mic, absolutely terrible. He seems like he's spaced out all the time kinda like he's a stoner...oh wait
People think that since RVD bounces around on the ropes a couple of times that he's great. He's been doing the same stuff since the mid 90's and hasn't changed/evolved his game since. He bores me in the ring and yeah he might put on a decent match every now and then but he should be nowhere near what's supposed to be the 2nd most prestigious belt in the WWE. RVD and Del Rio aren't selling this fued at all either, they don't come across on screen as disliking each other. They seem like they're 2 buddies that go have a couple of drinks after every match. At this point i'm begging for freakin Sheamus to come back and save me. I'd really like to see Punk go after it in the near future after the WWE stops beating the dead horse that is this "Punk vs Heyman's goons" fued. A lengthy Punk WHC reign would add some needed legitimacy to the belt.
Anyways...what does the IWC think about this?
The feud is bloody awful and both could be doing more. Why WWE put Rvd in such a feud shocks me. I would not mind Rvd doing some main event feuds which could be worth watching but not this rubbish, Rvd as heel with Paul Heyman perfect